Arithmetic and geometric progression

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a problem where the fourth, seventh, and sixteenth terms of an arithmetic progression (AP) are in geometric progression (GP). It clarifies that these terms of the AP correspond to the first three terms of the GP. The terms can be expressed as a + 3d, a + 6d, and a + 15d, leading to equations based on the properties of GP. Additionally, the sum of the first six terms of the AP is given as 12, providing further equations to find the values of the first term, common difference, and common ratio. The problem is solvable with the correct interpretation of the terms involved.
tykescar
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
If the fourth, seventh and sixteenth terms of an AP are in geometric progression, the first six terms of the AP have a sum of 12, find the common difference of the AP and the common ratio of the GP.
I've been assuming that the fourth, seventh and sixteenth terms of the AP are the fourth, seventh and sixteenth of the GP, which isn't the case.
How do I start?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi,
actually the question says that the 4th, 7th and 16th term of the AP is the 1st, 2nd and 3rd term of the GP.
Then it is solvable.
 
Let a be the first term, d the common difference. Then the 4th, 7th, and 16th terms are a+ 3d, a+ 6d, and a+ 15d. Saying that they form a geometric progression means that a+ 6d= r(a+ 3d) and a+ 15d= r(a+ 6d). Also, the 6th term is a+ 5d so the sum of the first 6 terms is ((a+ a+ 5d)/2)(6)= 3(2a+ 5d)= 12. That gives three equations to solve for a, d, and r.
 
Got it, thanks.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top