Arrow is short vetically upwards (Force/Springs)

  • Thread starter Thread starter KICKERMAN360
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Short
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the height an arrow rises when shot vertically from a bow with a spring constant of 500 N/m. The upward force exerted by the bow is 275 N, derived from the spring's compression of 55 cm. To find the acceleration of the arrow, the force is divided by the mass of the arrow, resulting in an upward acceleration. However, gravity must be factored in, as it exerts a downward force of 9.8 m/s². The correct approach involves subtracting the gravitational acceleration from the calculated upward acceleration to determine the net acceleration.
KICKERMAN360
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 110 g arrow is shot vertically from a bow whose effective spring constant is 500 N/m

If the bow is drawn 55 cm before shooting the arrow, to what height does the arrow rise?

Homework Equations



F=ma
U=kx^2 - for Spring (bow)
F=-kx

KE=1/2 mv^2
W=fs

The Attempt at a Solution



I found by using:
F=500 * .55
= 275N

The arrow moves upwards at 275N

It therefore accelerates at:
F=ma
a= F/m
= 275/.110

Gravity is assumed to be -9.8.

Thanks for any help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
KICKERMAN360 said:

Homework Statement



A 110 g arrow is shot vertically from a bow whose effective spring constant is 500 N/m

If the bow is drawn 55 cm before shooting the arrow, to what height does the arrow rise?

Homework Equations



F=ma
U=kx^2 - for Spring (bow)
F=-kx

KE=1/2 mv^2
W=fs

The Attempt at a Solution



I found by using:
F=500 * .55
= 275N

The arrow moves upwards at 275N

It therefore accelerates at:
F=ma
a= F/m
= 275/.110

Gravity is assumed to be -9.8.

Thanks for any help
That arrow does not move upwards with 275 Newtons. The bow puts 275 Newtons of upward force on it...

So what is the total acceleration on the arrow after you factor in gravity and compute the acceleration from the spring (275/.110)?
 
I figured that much out but could you explain further. Is it simply like vectors? Where I just minus 9.8 from 2500 and then use 2491.2 as the overall acceleration upwards?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top