Article about symmetries (math problems)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on confusion regarding specific equations in a physics thesis, particularly equations 2.22 and 2.36. The user seeks clarification on the derivative notation in equation 2.36, recognizing it as a mathematical trick but lacking understanding. A response suggests that the confusion can be resolved by considering the scaling of the potential and its relationship to time. The scaling transformation involves adjusting the variable q and the potential V, which clarifies the mathematical context. Overall, the exchange highlights the importance of understanding scaling in physics equations.
Caloric
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all.

When I was reading a paper (http://physics.brown.edu/physics/undergradpages/theses/SeniorThesis_tlevine1.pdf) I have had a problem. I don’t understand some equations, namely I don’t understand 2.22 and 2.36. I confused by derivative \left(\frac{\partial t’}{\partial t}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}} in the last (2.36) equation.
It’s clear for me, that it is mathematical trick, but I don’t know it. I would be happy if you could give me an explanation or a link for some literature.


Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you have to use the given potential and its scaling.

q \to \sqrt{\lambda} q is equivalent to a scaling of V by 1/λ, and this corresponds to a scaling of t \to \lambda t.
+- some exponents
 
thank you, i get it
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top