- #91
mouseman
Probly.
Why does the rain in Spain fall mainly on the plain?
Why does the rain in Spain fall mainly on the plain?
Ask a Stupid Quetion Get a Stupid Answer
- Thread starter climbhi
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Stupid
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a playful and humorous exchange in a new forum, encouraging participants to ask "stupid questions" and receive equally silly answers. Participants engage in lighthearted banter, often incorporating puns and wordplay, such as discussing the time it might take to reach 1,000 posts or the best superpower, with self-levitation being a favorite. Questions range from the absurd, like the fate of old forums, to whimsical inquiries about elephants and the universe. The tone is irreverent, with users joking about the nature of their questions and the concept of "stupidity" in their responses. The thread serves as a space for creative and nonsensical dialogue, emphasizing fun over seriousness.
Physics news on Phys.org
Manuel_Silvio
- 121
- 0
For rain in Spain is not mainly much sane.
How insane is rain in Spain?
How insane is rain in Spain?
Mentat
- 3,935
- 3
Originally posted by Manuel_Silvio
For rain in Spain is not mainly much sane.
How insane is rain in Spain?
Not insane, merely plain, and the bane of life in Spain.
What's the point of talking in rhyme?
Mr. Robin Parsons
- 1,243
- 0
Originally asked by Mentat
What's the point of talking in rhyme?
It is the reason for the meter, and the time!
Is, from now on, your quention soooooooooooo stupid,
That it will be a rhyme with such love, that we'll call you cupid?
J-Man
- 199
- 1
Ummm... no, probably not. In fact, I'm quite sure that it will not. That was cute though.Mr. Robin Parsons asked:
Is, from now on, your quention soooooooooooo stupid,
That it will be a rhyme with such love, that we'll call you cupid?
Does the 'Parsons to English Dictionary' rhyme the definitions?
climbhi
It depends on how drunk the user is.
On average have the questions in PF 2.0 been stupider then those in PF 3.0 have been, or is it the other way around?
On average have the questions in PF 2.0 been stupider then those in PF 3.0 have been, or is it the other way around?
J-Man
- 199
- 1
Originally posted by climbhi
On average have the questions in PF 2.0 been stupider then those in PF 3.0 have been, or is it the other way around?
The MSQ (mean stupidity quotient) of the quetions on PF2 were rated on a scale of 1 to 10 and amazingly were ranked at -437.2. That can be roughly translated as meaning "Never before found levels of stupidity." If we were to compare this score with the current MSQ rating of the PF3 quetions, which would be kinda like comparing apples to other kinds of apples, we find that these questions, on a scale of 0 to 9, for some reason, have been rated a nominal -42. This could be interrpreted as meaning only "Embarrasingly stupid." Reflecting on this data, the answer to the question escapes me at this time.
Does a really long answer qualify as a stupid answer, or must it be genuinely stupid no matter the length?
climbhi
I think the most geniunely stupid answers, or at least those with the highest MSQ are the exceedingly short, yet unbelievably stupid answers.
This begs the question, what's better a very short answer that is just embarissingly stupid, or a somewhat longer question but which is on a level of never before seen stupidity.
This begs the question, what's better a very short answer that is just embarissingly stupid, or a somewhat longer question but which is on a level of never before seen stupidity.
Mr. Robin Parsons
- 1,243
- 0
Originally asked by climbhi
This begs the question, what's better a very short answer that is just embarissingly stupid, or a somewhat longer question but which is on a level of never before seen stupidity.
Yes, most assuredly, positively, you got it!
If climbhi knew "The man from Nantucket" rhyme, would he tell the rest of us, in due time?
Manuel_Silvio
- 121
- 0
She/he actually mimes all those rhymes from far ancient times but if you give two dimes, believe me, they'll be much better than limes to which the word rhymes - that you've used so many times - well rhymes... (the maker of these rhymes who lost her/his life in old times did hear them listening to wind chimes)...
Why those rhymes from far ancient times chose to settle down in wind chimes?
Why those rhymes from far ancient times chose to settle down in wind chimes?
Mr. Robin Parsons
- 1,243
- 0
Originally Asked by Manuel_Silvio
Why those rhymes from far ancient times chose to settle down in wind chimes?
So when the wind blows hard, those rhymes do retard, and we find those stupid quentions from the ancient card!
If life "Is like a box of chocolates" then why run?
Mentat
- 3,935
- 3
Originally posted by Mr. Robin Parsons
So when the wind blows hard, those rhymes do retard, and we find those stupid quentions from the ancient card!
If life "Is like a box of chocolates" then why run?
Chocolate gives me gass.
Where do you think Forest's mother got the "Gump" part from?
Mr. Robin Parsons
- 1,243
- 0
Originally asked by Mentat
Where do you think Forest's mother got the "Gump" part from?
Gets Under Mom's Pillows!
If the end is the last thing you will ever see, then why did it rhyme?
Manuel_Silvio
- 121
- 0
I tell you it didn't!
How could you ever think about it?
How could you ever think about it?
Mr. Robin Parsons
- 1,243
- 0
Originally Posted/asked by Manuel_Silvio
How could you ever think about it?
Cheeeese, My first interview, well, you see the idea first came to me one long and lonely night whilst I was sitting at my typewriter. The Coffee had been brewing for some time and the wind was most assuredly NOT howling at my door (it was summer after all) so it was the most experiantial thing that could have arisen, given the timing and the place, and the other variables that are, well, just too long to go into tedious detail about, so if brief, the socks I was wearing, oooops, I wasn't wearing socks, that's right, the shoes were sandals and the pants joggers. In a T shirt was I dressed, and the long and the short of it is, well, to long to go into here, so I'll just give you the skinny, (the 'short of it' for all of you not involved in the 'skinny of things') (actually I was a little overweight at the time but...) it was likened unto something that I had not experianced before, so I decided to write it down, but that backfired when I, six months later, decided to re-read what I had written, and realized that it was un-intelligable to anyone other then myself, so I continued, until this very day, when I now tell you all this little story, (clearly well truncated, but just as clearly, easily, readable, and so direct, and to the point that it behooves you to respond to it) that was what happened when I had decided to tell you all about how I thought of it!
Clear enough?
Last edited:
Manuel_Silvio
- 121
- 0
Well, the matter seems clear now. You've the right excuse for thinking so but then something is wrong here, let me see ...
If the wind was NOT howling at your door, where could it be howling then?
If the wind was NOT howling at your door, where could it be howling then?
mouseman
At your door.
If you can pick your friends, and you can pick your nose, how come you can't pick your friend's nose?
If you can pick your friends, and you can pick your nose, how come you can't pick your friend's nose?
climbhi
Who says you can't?
If you're friend had a cast on both his hands and couldn't pick his nose and asked you to do it for him, would you?
If you're friend had a cast on both his hands and couldn't pick his nose and asked you to do it for him, would you?
mouseman
Only if he doesn't have cooties.
Asphinctersezwhat?
Asphinctersezwhat?
22-16
snfansaofnqaqa.
Why do we use the internet when we can just use homing pigeons?
Why do we use the internet when we can just use homing pigeons?
Manuel_Silvio
- 121
- 0
For we hate AOL Times Warner monopoly on Multimedia MIME-enabled homing pigeons who've registered HPCP port 666 for their so-called well-known service breaking the rules stated in all hacker legends that date back to the time when no rules where set yet.
* HPCP -> Homing Pigeon Control Protocol, their so-called competitor to TCP which in fact runs on IP, lame!
Which came first, pigeon or pigeon egg?
* HPCP -> Homing Pigeon Control Protocol, their so-called competitor to TCP which in fact runs on IP, lame!
Which came first, pigeon or pigeon egg?
J-Man
- 199
- 1
To get to the other side.Manuel_Silvio asked:
Which came first, pigeon or pigeon egg?
How many light bulbs does it take to change a chicken?
Manuel_Silvio
- 121
- 0
As for light tulip bulbs the answer is 42. Assuming medium tulip bulbs will result in total confusion while heavy tulip bulbs have better prospect in changing a chicken if they're used in accordance to the accompanying manual. For optimal performance please use factory defaults, alternative/jazz/rock/pop/reggae settings are not guaranteed not to blow it all up.
What is the alternative?
What is the alternative?
Andy
- 73
- 14
when considering chickens, you must remember to what extent do the tulip bulbs effect the average human being, and when thinking about this issue, do you a. get confused, b. get pissed off as you know how much more sense this makes than the last message, or c. need to reply in order to make you feel like u have accomplished something in your pittiful little unfortantly exsisting lifes!
Mentat
- 3,935
- 3
Originally posted by Manuel_Silvio
As for light tulip bulbs the answer is 42. Assuming medium tulip bulbs will result in total confusion while heavy tulip bulbs have better prospect in changing a chicken if they're used in accordance to the accompanying manual. For optimal performance please use factory defaults, alternative/jazz/rock/pop/reggae settings are not guaranteed not to blow it all up.
What is the alternative?
There is no alternative, the answer to everything is 42.
Does this mean that 42-year-old should have all of the answers?
Mr. Robin Parsons
- 1,243
- 0
Originally asked, appropriatley, by Mentat
Does this mean that 42-year-old should have all of the answers?
No, first you must reach 42, then you must surpass it, then, and only then, when regressing back to the age of your original enlightenment, about 5, will you even begin to realize that, NO!, you do not now, nor will you ever, have all of the answers, because, and only because, you will be missing one singular piece of information, and I will never-tell you that one,Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
What is the missing piece of information?
(A classically stupid question, cause only I can answer it! {Re-insert string of Ha Ha's Here!} and as I said, I'll never tell, well maybe tomorrow, but......)
J-Man
- 199
- 1
That if the answer to everything, and what the actual question is (to everything) are both known at the same time, obviously, we will all be sucked into a great big ball of silly-string.Mr. Robin Parsons asked:
What is the missing piece of information?
What do you get if you multiply six by nine?
Another God
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
- 970
- 4
42.Originally posted by J-Man
What do you get if you multiply six by nine?
How many paths must a man walk down?
Manuel_Silvio
- 121
- 0
The answer my friend, is blowin' in the wind. In other words, this is a very good example of how pigs and politicians have the same beginning but end differently.
Everywhere there's lots of piggies living piggy lives, why should we live in these dummy boring piggy hives?
Everywhere there's lots of piggies living piggy lives, why should we live in these dummy boring piggy hives?
Last edited:
Another God
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
- 970
- 4
because its a maze in here! Have you ever actually tried to get out?
How exactly does one 'excite' an electron?
How exactly does one 'excite' an electron?