MHB [ASK] Addition of Fractions: 1/3+1/6+1/10+1/15+1/21+....+1/231

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monoxdifly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Addition Fractions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the sum of the series $$\frac13+\frac16+\frac1{10}+\frac1{15}+\frac1{21}+...+\frac1{231}$$, which is equivalent to summing the reciprocals of triangular numbers. Participants note that the series can be expressed using the formula for triangular numbers, leading to the conclusion that the sum simplifies to $$\frac{10}{11}$$. A method involving pattern recognition and mathematical induction is suggested for proving the result, while an alternative approach using telescoping sums is also presented. The final value of the series is confirmed as $$\frac{10}{11}$$, making it accessible for middle school students with some guidance.
Monoxdifly
MHB
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
Determine the value of $$\frac13+\frac16+\frac1{10}+\frac1{15}+\frac1{21}+...+\frac1{231}$$
I know that it means $$\frac1{1+2}+\frac1{1+2+3}+\frac1{1+2+3+4}+\frac1{1+2+3+4+5}+\frac1{1+2+3+4+5+6}+...+\frac1{231}$$, but how do I answer? It's from a student worksheet for 7th graders, so they haven't learned about sequence and series yet. Granted, the book also says that the question was from a middle school-level math contest.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Monoxdifly said:
Determine the value of $$\frac13+\frac16+\frac1{10}+\frac1{15}+\frac1{21}+...+\frac1{231}$$
I know that it means $$\frac1{1+2}+\frac1{1+2+3}+\frac1{1+2+3+4}+\frac1{1+2+3+4+5}+\frac1{1+2+3+4+5+6}+...+\frac1{231}$$, but how do I answer? It's from a student worksheet for 7th graders, so they haven't learned about sequence and series yet. Granted, the book also says that the question was from a middle school-level math contest.
A 7th grader should start by asking how $\dfrac1{231}$ fits into the series of terms $\dfrac1{1+2+\ldots + n}$. A bright student like a middle school math contestant should probably know that $1+2+\ldots + n = \frac12n(n+1)$. If that is equal to $231$ then $n(n+1) = 462$, from which it's not hard to see that $n=21$.

So we want to find the sum $$\frac1{1+2}+\frac1{1+2+3}+\frac1{1+2+3+4}+ \ldots +\frac1{1+2+3+4+ \ldots +21}$$.

Start by summing the first few terms, adding one more term to the previous sum each time: $$\frac1{1+2} = \frac13,$$ $$\frac1{1+2}+\frac1{1+2+3} = \frac13 + \frac16 = \frac36 = \frac12,$$ $$\frac1{1+2}+\frac1{1+2+3}+\frac1{1+2+3+4} = \frac12 + \frac1{10} = \frac6{10} = \frac35,$$ $$\frac1{1+2}+\frac1{1+2+3}+\frac1{1+2+3+4}+\frac1{1+2+3+4+5} = \frac35 + \frac1{15} = \frac{10}{15} = \frac23,$$ $$\frac1{1+2}+\frac1{1+2+3}+\frac1{1+2+3+4}+\frac1{1+2+3+4+5}+\frac1{1+2+3+4+5+6} = \frac23 + \frac1{21} = \frac{15}{21} = \frac57.$$ At this point, a bright 7th grader ought to spot a pattern in these partial sums $$\frac1{1+{\color{red}2}} = \color{red}\frac13,$$ $$\frac1{1+2}+\frac1{1+2+{\color{red}3}} = \frac12 = \color{red}\frac24,$$ $$\frac1{1+2}+\frac1{1+2+3}+\frac1{1+2+3+{\color{red}4}} = \color{red}\frac35,$$ $$\frac1{1+2}+\frac1{1+2+3}+\frac1{1+2+3+4}+\frac1{1+2+3+4+{\color{red}5}} = \frac23 = \color{red}\frac46,$$ $$\frac1{1+2}+\frac1{1+2+3}+\frac1{1+2+3+4}+\frac1{1+2+3+4+5}+\frac1{1+2+3+4+5+{\color{red}6}} = \color{red}\frac57,$$ and jump to the (corrrect) conclusion that $$\frac1{1+2}+\frac1{1+2+3}+\frac1{1+2+3+4}+ \ldots +\frac1{1+2+3+4+ \ldots + {\color{red}21}} = {\color{red}\frac {20}{22}} = \frac{10}{11}$$.

I think it would be asking too much of a 7th grader to do any more than that. But a user of this forum ought to be able to use induction to prove the result that $$\sum_{n=2}^N \frac1{1+2+\ldots+n} = \frac{N-1}{N+1}.$$
 
Indeed. A standard trick for high school math contests is to start with one term, then two terms, and so on, and try to spot a pattern. Then generalize the pattern, and fill in the final value.
And yes, it requires a bit of a jump to spot the pattern that Opalg pointed out.

Anyway, I'd like to point out a different method that should be within reach of high schoolers, which admittedly does become a bit easier with knowledge of and familiarity with fractions in general, arithmetic sequences, telescoping sums, and fraction decomposition.
If finds Opalg's formula directly rather than spotting the pattern and proving it by induction.

Let $n$ be such that $1+2+\ldots+n = 231$, then:
$$
\begin{aligned}
\frac 13 + \frac 16 + \frac 1{10}+\ldots+ \frac 1{231}
&= \frac 1{1+2} + \frac 1{1+2+3} + \frac 1{1+2+3+4}+\ldots+ \frac 1{1+2+\ldots+n} \\
&= \frac 1{\frac 12\cdot 2(1+2)} + \frac 1{\frac 12\cdot 3(1+3)} + \frac 1{\frac 12\cdot 4(1+4)}+\ldots+ \frac 1{\frac 12\cdot n(1+n)} \\
&= 2\Bigg(\frac 1{2\cdot 3} + \frac 1{3\cdot 4} + \frac 1{4\cdot 5}+\ldots+ \frac 1{n(n+1)}\Bigg) \\
&= 2\Bigg(\left(\frac 12-\frac 13\right) + \left(\frac 13-\frac 14\right) + \left(\frac 14-\frac 15\right)+\ldots+ \left(\frac 1n-\frac 1{n+1}\right)\Bigg) \\
&= 2\Bigg(\frac 12-\frac 1{n+1}\Bigg) \\
&= \frac {n-1}{n+1}
\end{aligned}
$$
That leaves figuring out what $n$ is.
We can solve the equation, or we can just use trial and error to find that $n=21$. Indeed $\frac 12\cdot 21(1+21) = 231$.

So the sum is:
$$\frac 13 + \frac 16 + \frac 1{10}+\ldots+ \frac 1{231}=\frac {21-1}{21+1}=\frac{10}{11}$$
 
I think I get it now. Thanks to both of you.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top