Astrometry and Elliptical orbits

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mu naught
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbits
AI Thread Summary
Distance to solar orbiting objects can be measured using parallax, while angular velocity is determined by tracking positional changes over time. Accurate orbit calculations require considering elliptical orbits as conic sections rather than assuming circular paths. The discussion highlights the need for a solid understanding of orbital mechanics, particularly for calculating orbits like that of comet Hartley. Practical observations and theoretical knowledge are both essential for deriving accurate orbital equations. Resources such as astronomy textbooks and specific methodologies, like those developed by Gauss, are recommended for further study.
Mu naught
Messages
208
Reaction score
2
You can measure the distance to an object orbiting the sun using parallax, and you can determine its angular velocity by measuring its change in position over several hours or days.

From this you can calculate its orbit... if it were circular. However, comets and asteroids follow elliptical orbits, not circular ones. How do you determine the true orbit of an object and its eccentricity?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
http://www.schillerinstitute.org/fid_97-01/982_Gauss_Ceres.html

EDIT:
Just read a bit into the paper. Sorry, seems to be crap written by a philosopher. It's 85 pages, though, so maybe there's something worth reading in the rest of the paper.
However, what I wanted to say: You determine orbits not on the assumption of circles, but of conic sections. That covers everything.
 
Last edited:
Ich said:
http://www.schillerinstitute.org/fid_97-01/982_Gauss_Ceres.html

EDIT:
Just read a bit into the paper. Sorry, seems to be crap written by a philosopher. It's 85 pages, though, so maybe there's something worth reading in the rest of the paper.
However, what I wanted to say: You determine orbits not on the assumption of circles, but of conic sections. That covers everything.

thanks i don't have time to look at it now but i will tomorrow. I understand that an ellipse is a conic section, but what I don't really understand is how to apply the measurements you can make - distance and average angular velocity over some interval of time - to the equation for an ellipse.

I should mention the reason I ask is because I'm taking a course in observation astronomy and I'd like to calculate the orbit of comet Hartley for my research project.
 
Actually, what you measure is angular position at different times, and nothing else. I hereby frankly admit that I don't know how to calculate orbits from these measurements, but CFG seems to have devised a valid method 200 years ago. Try to find it.
 
For a fairly extensive description of the process I can recommend [1]. For an introduction I would recommend that you find an astronomy textbook suitable for your level that also describes orbital determination (like Gauss method). There is a fairly big difference between just knowing what practical observations to make in order to determine orbits, and then to derive the theory and computer code needed to make the actual calculations.

[1] Statistical Orbit Determination, Byron D. Tapley, Bob E. Schutz, George Henry Born. Elsevier Academic Press, 2004. (http://books.google.com/books?id=qePVQF9v15kC)
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top