Physics Astrophysics on par with physics? (perception-wise)

AI Thread Summary
Astrophysics is recognized as a legitimate specialization within the broader field of physics, comparable to areas like condensed matter or nuclear physics. An astrophysicist is considered a full-fledged physicist, capable of engaging in physics research and holding academic positions typically associated with physicists. The distinction between astronomy and physics remains, with astronomy often viewed as more fringe in academic contexts, whereas physicists can transition into astrophysics without issue.
torquemada
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

earlier this year I asked about astronomy vs physics, and the general consensus was that, at least in the academic world, astronomy is thought of as fringe in the sense that you won't get hired to a physics post or be able to do physics research, but a physicist could do astronomy. What about an astrophysicist? Is that considered a full blown physicist, like a condensed matter physicist or nuclear physicist? Or is that lumped together with the astronomer in the academic world? thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes astrophysics is just one specialization among many. An astrophysistist is just as much a physisist as a particle physisist or any other kind.
 
Hello, I graduated from undergrad a few years ago with a Major in Physics and minor in Electrical Engineering. I tried to get experience working on and testing circuits through my professor who studied Neutrinos, however covid caused the opportunity to go away and I graduated with no experience or internships. I have attempted to break into the engineering industry with no success. Right now I am considering going for a Masters in Electrical Engineering and I need advice on if this would be...

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top