I choosing a career in physics to pursue

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a grade 10 student's challenge in selecting a physics-related career for a summative study. The student has compiled a lengthy list of potential careers in physics and seeks advice on how to narrow down the options based on personal interests and job availability.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • The student expresses a preference for theoretical work and mentions skills in computer science, cosmology, and quantum mechanics.
  • One participant suggests simplifying the list by categorizing fields into experimental vs. theoretical physics and scoring them based on personal criteria.
  • Another participant proposes randomly selecting a career since the assignment is not a life decision.
  • A participant questions the effectiveness of using criteria for decision-making and emphasizes the need for more information about the careers listed, including which are experimental and which may be obsolete.
  • One participant acknowledges a misunderstanding regarding the source of the list and reiterates the importance of making an informed decision based on personal preferences.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on how to approach the career selection process. Some advocate for a structured method using criteria, while others suggest a more casual approach, such as random selection. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best method for the student to choose a career.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the student's uncertainty about the relevance and job prospects of various physics careers, as well as differing opinions on decision-making strategies. There are no settled conclusions about which careers are more viable or preferable.

Klashta Neali
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am only in grade 10 but stupid Careers course says I have to choose a career to do a summative study on. I want to choose something that I might go into but I can't choose. The NOC list for "Physics and Astronomy" is very long--I deleted the ones I am not interested in:
  • aerophysicist
  • aerospace research scientist
  • astronomer
  • astrophysicist
  • chemical physicist
  • cosmic ray physicist
  • cosmologist
  • cryogenics physicist
  • electricity and magnetism physicist
  • elementary particle physicist
  • elementary particle theorist
  • high-temperature physicist
  • laser physicist
  • low-temperature physicist
  • magnetism physicist
  • molecular biophysicist
  • nanotechnology physicist
  • nuclear physicist
  • nuclear reactor physicist
  • particle accelerator physicist
  • particle physicist
  • photonics physicist
  • physicist
  • physicist, elementary particles
  • physics research scientist
  • plasma physicist
  • reactor physicist
  • research scientist, aerospace
  • research scientist, physics
  • space physicist
  • theoretical nuclear physicist
  • theorist, elementary particles
  • thermal physicist
  • X-ray physicist
I know it's a long list but I don't know what to choose... I like theoretical work, research, and stuff that mostly requires thinking. A lot of thinking and pondering and philosophy stuff. I think a lot.
I am fairly skilled with computers and partway through my first computer science course.
I already know a lot about cosmology and quantum mechanics.
Please help; this is due on Friday (Nov, 6).
Something that is at least some positions/job offerings is preferable.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you made this unnecessarily complicated. How did you come to develop this list? I would have listed the fields of physics and not the experimental vs theoretical instead I'd use it as a criteria doing this cuts your list in half.

Why not design some criteria and score each type and then look at the high scoring ones?

Since you mentioned your interest in computers then simulation work makes sense which means theoretical physics so scratch all the experimental stuff.

Since you mention jobs then most cosmology / particle physics / cutting edge stuff is removed leaving nanotech,

You never mentioned Biology and physics perhaps that would be something you'd like for example proteomics or genomics.
 
Why not pick one at random? It's for a report, for heaven's sake, not your life.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: e.bar.goum
jedishrfu said:
I think you made this unnecessarily complicated. How did you come to develop this list? I would have listed the fields of physics and not the experimental vs theoretical instead I'd use it as a criteria doing this cuts your list in half.

Why not design some criteria and score each type and then look at the high scoring ones?

Since you mentioned your interest in computers then simulation work makes sense which means theoretical physics so scratch all the experimental stuff.

Since you mention jobs then most cosmology / particle physics / cutting edge stuff is removed leaving nanotech,

You never mentioned Biology and physics perhaps that would be something you'd like for example proteomics or genomics.
I appreciate the time you took in writing your post but clearly you didn't pay much attention to what I wrote. If you did, maybe it would have been more helpful, but it isn't.

Criteria? Really? That doesn't work. First of all I am not going to research each and every one of those; secondly, one of the career assignments was to develop a bunch of criteria and it was the dumbest thing ever. I don't choose careers like that.
I think it would make more sense if I told you I copy-pasted the list from the NOC website (which I mentioned, but since you didn't read it, you asked how I "developed" the list...). http://www5.hrsdc.gc.ca/NOC/English/NOC/2011/ViewAllTitles.aspx?val=2&val1=2111
I had also stated that I had copy-pasted and then deleted the ones I didn't think I'd be interested in. I don't know the others very well. That's why I'm asking on here. What are the others like? Which ones are experimental? Which ones can I delete? What careers are practically obsolete in job searching?
 
I'm sorry my post didn't help. It's true I didn't notice that you got your list from the NOC list as your post doesn't explicitly state ithat that's where you got it from but upon rereading I can see what you meant.

However, you misunderstood my criteria suggestion. The criteria could be based on anything that comes to mind what you like more or what you imagine is required or what you may think you need to know because basically you just want to choose one career to write about. Its a variant of the classic way of making an informed decision using pros and cons then picking the one with the most favorable pros and least hated cons.

You could also try flipping coins to choose one career.

Please remember we are volunteers here at PF and we try to help students with their questions, we aren't here to be told how worthless our posts are even if they are less than helpful to your particular problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Intraverno

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
11K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K