Atomic collisions must be elastic?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the collision of ground-state hydrogen atoms, emphasizing that an inelastic collision cannot occur under specific conditions. It is established that if the total kinetic energy decreases in an inelastic collision, it contradicts the conservation of momentum, leading to the conclusion that the collision must be elastic. However, further analysis reveals that inelastic collisions are possible if less than half of the initial kinetic energy is lost, allowing for some energy to be absorbed by changes in the atoms' internal states. The specific scenario presented shows that with a kinetic energy of 12 eV, the collision must be elastic since the minimum energy required for an internal state change exceeds the available kinetic energy after the collision. Ultimately, while inelastic atomic collisions can occur under certain conditions, the specific case discussed confirms that this collision must be elastic.
gmark
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Ground-state hydrogen atom with 12 ev kinetic energy collides head-on with another ground-state hydrogen atom at rest. Using principles of conservation of energy and momentum, show that an inelastic collision cannot occur. Therefore the collision must be elastic.

Homework Equations



Sum of energy before equals sum of energy after
Vector sum of momentum before equals vector sum of momentum after

The Attempt at a Solution



If the collision is inelastic, then the total kinetic energy after the collision will be less than it was before. Conservation of energy requires that the atoms absorb some of the initial kinetic energy and change their internal state.

Conservation of momentum requires that the vector sum of velocities be unchanged by the collision (masses cancelling out). There is no way for this to occur, as I see it, if the total kinetic energy has been reduced by an inelastic collision. Therefore the collision must be elastic.

This logic seems to say that all collisions between like atoms are elastic. Correct? Regardless of the initial kinetic energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, gmark. Welcome to PF!
gmark said:
Conservation of momentum requires that the vector sum of velocities be unchanged by the collision (masses cancelling out). There is no way for this to occur, as I see it, if the total kinetic energy has been reduced by an inelastic collision. Therefore the collision must be elastic.

This logic seems to say that all collisions between like atoms are elastic. Correct? Regardless of the initial kinetic energy?

I don't think your conclusion is correct. Did you actually go through the math to show that in this problem the collision must be elastic?
 
TSny embarrasses me into working out the math. I find that my hand-waving was wrong. Inelastic collision is possible if at least half of the initial kinetic energy remains as kinetic energy after the collision. That is, up to half the initial K can change the atom's internal state if appropriate quantum levels are available.

Here's my math. Subscripts or superscripts indicate post-collision values, plain symbols are for pre-collision. Velocity is treated as scalar, since all motion is along a line.
v is velocity
m is atomic mass
K is kinetic energy

In a fully elastic collision, particles essentially exchange momenta. K = K'. At any time except during impact one particle or the other has zero velocity. In at least some inelastic collisions (eg bullet and ballistic pendulum), both particles have non-zero velocities after collision.

Conservation of momentum:
mv = m(v1 + v2)
so v = v1 + v2

Before collision:
K = 1/2(mv2) = 1/2(m(v1 + v2)2)

After:
K' = 1/2(m(v12 + v22))

This gives

v12 - v*v1 + (K - K')/m = 0

where v = √(2K/m)

Values of v1 are real for K' ≥ K/2, so inelastic collisions are possible provided less than half of the initial kinetic energy is "lost."
 
What is the answer to the original problem then? K = 12 eV.
 
The answer is that this collision must be elastic. The least amount of energy that a stationary ground-state H atom can absorb is 10.2ev, to change the principal quantum number n from 1 (-13.6ev) to 2 (-3.4ev). Such a change would result in a residual K' = 12.0 - 10.2 = 1.8ev, which is less than K/2. This particular inelastic collision could not occur.

The answer is also that inelastic atomic collisions are possible under certain conditions, contrary to my original conclusion that they cannot take place at all.
 
Very well.

Note, however, that there are smaller quantum effects, which are known as fine and hyperfine structures, where very tiny fluctuations of energy are possible.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top