What is the Atomic Mass of Deuterium According to Parthey's Measurements?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The atomic mass of Deuterium, as measured by CG Parthey, is calculated to be 3.3434891661E-27 kg, which shows a discrepancy when compared to the Codata value of 3.3435834800E-27 kg. This calculation is based on the frequency difference of 670 994 334 606(15) Hz between Hydrogen and Deuterium, using the formula involving the reduced masses of the particles. The discussion raises questions about the assumptions made in the calculations and the potential influence of the Dirac equation on the results, particularly regarding the nonlinear dependence of the Dirac energy on the mass ratio.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atomic mass and its measurement techniques
  • Familiarity with the Dirac equation and its implications in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of frequency measurements in atomic transitions
  • Basic grasp of reduced mass calculations in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the Dirac equation and its applications in atomic physics
  • Research the methods for measuring atomic transition frequencies
  • Investigate discrepancies in atomic mass measurements and their implications
  • Learn about the significance of the 1s-2s and 1s-2p transitions in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in atomic and quantum physics, and students studying atomic mass measurements and their theoretical foundations.

neilparker62
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,200
Reaction score
710
In the same article which describes the accurate measurement of the Hydrogen 1s-2s transition at:

2 466 061 413 187 035 (10) Hz,

CG Parthey also measures the frequency difference between Hydrogen and Deuterium which he gives as:

670 994 334 606(15) Hz.

Assuming that the transition frequencies for Hydrogen and Deuterium are in the ratio of their reduced masses, I determine the atomic mass of Deuterium according to the following formula.

\large \frac{m_e\left(1+\frac{\Delta f}{f_h}\right)}{\frac{m_e}{m_p}-\frac{\Delta f}{f_h}}

The result is 3.3434891661E-27 as compared to the Codata value 3.3435834800E-27

Given the levels of accuracy in Parthey's measurements, there seems to be some discrepancy between the calculated result and the Codata value.

Am I perhaps making an incorrect assumption or am using an incorrect formula ? If not what might be an explanation for this discrepancy ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry - that is to say in the ratio of the electron's reduced mass (Hydrogen) to electron's reduced mass (Deuterium).
 
I would guess that the discrepancy is because the Dirac energy (2.3) has a nonlinear dependence on ##m_e/m_N##. It's hard to quickly determine the order of magnitude of the correction since it ultimately appears in a difference.
 
Could you perhaps try calculating the frequency difference using the Dirac equation with Codata value for atomic mass of Deuterium and then with the above value. See which one predicts better against Parthey's measurement. (I haven't a clue about the Dirac equation so would not be able to do this myself.)
 
Calculations may be on 1s-2p cause 1s-2s can't conserve angular momentum.
 
theodoros.mihos said:
Calculations may be on 1s-2p cause 1s-2s can't conserve angular momentum.
Perhaps I'm out of depth on theory here but if the 1s-2s transition is 'forbidden' , then how does Parthey measure it ? Same issue arose in another PF discussion on the Lyman Alpha profile.
 

Similar threads

  • Sticky
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
27K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
18K