Atomic X and Gamma Rays: Physical Process

AI Thread Summary
Atomic X-rays and nuclear gamma rays are distinguished by their origins; X-rays result from interactions with electrons, such as bremsstrahlung or inner orbital electron ejection, while gamma rays are produced by nuclear de-excitations or subatomic processes like antimatter reactions. There is no clear boundary between X-rays and gamma rays, as both are high-energy photons but stem from different physical processes. The term "photoelectric" does not apply as a common process for both emissions. Additionally, bound electrons do not generate gamma rays. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurately categorizing high-energy photon emissions.
catseye747
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
What is the physical process common to both the emissions of atomic x rays and nuclear gamma rays? is it photoelectric.. or the inverse.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There is no real clear cut border betwen what is a x-ray and what is a gamma ray. The convention is to use the word x-ray when talking abouyt high energy photons produced in interactions with electrons, for instance bremsstrahlung or by knocking out a electron from a inner orbital.
The word gamma ray is used to describe high energy photons produced by deexcitations in the nucleus or other subatomic processes like antimatter reactions etc.

So to answere your question, there isn't really any physical process comon to both since the two words are used to described photons originating in different physical processes.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Astronuc
On the other hand, bound electrons do not produce gamma rays.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top