Atomic X and Gamma Rays: Physical Process

AI Thread Summary
Atomic X-rays and nuclear gamma rays are distinguished by their origins; X-rays result from interactions with electrons, such as bremsstrahlung or inner orbital electron ejection, while gamma rays are produced by nuclear de-excitations or subatomic processes like antimatter reactions. There is no clear boundary between X-rays and gamma rays, as both are high-energy photons but stem from different physical processes. The term "photoelectric" does not apply as a common process for both emissions. Additionally, bound electrons do not generate gamma rays. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurately categorizing high-energy photon emissions.
catseye747
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
What is the physical process common to both the emissions of atomic x rays and nuclear gamma rays? is it photoelectric.. or the inverse.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There is no real clear cut border betwen what is a x-ray and what is a gamma ray. The convention is to use the word x-ray when talking abouyt high energy photons produced in interactions with electrons, for instance bremsstrahlung or by knocking out a electron from a inner orbital.
The word gamma ray is used to describe high energy photons produced by deexcitations in the nucleus or other subatomic processes like antimatter reactions etc.

So to answere your question, there isn't really any physical process comon to both since the two words are used to described photons originating in different physical processes.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Astronuc
On the other hand, bound electrons do not produce gamma rays.
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top