Auto-Compensating Polarization Changes with Mirror/Reflector and Faraday Mirror

islahna
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I read several literatures on quantum cryptography plug and play system. I found out that Faraday mirror was used to compensate polarization fluctuations. Photons are reflected orthogonally by Faraday mirror and their polarization changes will then be autocompensated, provided they follow the same path (same fiber). I'm thinking if we use a Mirror/reflector, will polarization changes be auto compensated as with Faraday Mirror ? Is it necessary that the reflected lights be orthogonally rotated in order to get autocompensated ?
thanks in advance.

regards,
--islahna
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, using a mirror/reflector can help to compensate polarization fluctuations, but the reflected light must be orthogonally rotated in order to get the auto-compensation. Faraday mirrors are designed to do this, as they have a special coating that rotates the light by 90 degrees when it is reflected. Without this, the polarization of the reflected light will not be compensated and the system may not work properly.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top