Autocorrelation and autocorrelation time

tomkeus
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
I have Metropolis-Markov algorithm and I need to determine integrated autocorrelation time. In order to do that i have to find autocorrelation and I don't quite get what to do.

For example, after equilibration I did N sweeps, took measurements at each one and I obtained N results O_i,i=1...N, for some observable.

Definition of autocorrelation says

A_O (t)=\frac{\langle O_i O_{i+t}\rangle-\langle O_i\rangle^2}{\langle O_i^2\rangle-\langle O_i\rangle^2}

What are those averages over? Should I average over i?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One more question. I have obtained N sweeps, so basically time goes from i=0 to i=N. When I want to obtain autocorrelation for lag t=N-1 i just have

A_O(t=N-1)=\frac{O_1 O_N-\langle O\rangle^2}{\sigma_O^2}

so I don't have any averaging for term O_1 O_N. Is that right or duration of my data should always be longer than maximum lag I'm calculating autocorrelation for?
 
If you have a single observation, the formula will still work in the arithmetical sense, but your results will not have a high level of confidence because you'd be making an inference about the population based on a single individual observation, O(1) x O(N). The longer the duration (relative to the lag), the higher will be the level of statistical confidence.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top