Average force and force/tension used

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between force, speed, and distance in the context of lifting weights. It uses the analogy of two butterflies flapping their wings at different rates to illustrate how more frequent, faster movements generate greater force and cover more distance in the same time frame. The key argument is that if one person lifts a weight more times in a shorter period, they exert more force and energy compared to someone who lifts the same weight fewer times over a longer duration. The conversation emphasizes that the amount of force applied directly correlates with the distance moved within the same timeframe, challenging the notion that equal force can result in different distances. Ultimately, the discussion seeks clarification on how force is quantified in these scenarios.
waynexk8
Messages
397
Reaction score
0
Not sure why my threads are closed ? As I think this needs an answer. To be honest, I do not think most here might have understood the question; let me explain the answer for you.

Imagine a giant Butterfly, one Butterfly flaps their wings once up for a height of 3m, taking 3 seconds, and then flaps them down for 3m, taking 3 seconds. Thus one flap. The Butterfly moves up in the air 3m.

Another Butterfly, flaps their wings once up for a height of 3m, taking .5 of second, and then flaps them down for 3m, taking .5 of a second. Thus six flaps. The Butterfly moves up in the air 18m.

A force is something that causes a object to undergo a change in speed, thus the most force for the same time frame, and the object undergoes more of a change in speed “thus covers more distance in the same time frame” right ?

So the second Butterfly produced MORE force/strength to move their wings, to move their whole bodies faster at more speed coving more distance. Butterfly one, did not produce as much force/strength in the same time frame, thus did not move so fast with as much speed, thus coved less distance.

Would you think I am right or wrong ? If wrong, how can Butterfly one not move as fast, with less speed, coving less distance if it used the same force/strength in the same time frame ? As a force is something that causes a object to undergo a change in speed, thus the most force for the same time frame, and the object undergoes more of a change in speed “thus covers more distance in the same time frame” right ?


Wayne
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We all agreed that the faster reps/flaps used far far more energy in the same time frame, but NO ONE said why ? If you use more energy in moving a body part faster in the same time frame, you “must” use more power, as more physical work is done and as we said more energy, so this in turn can mean only one thing, that we used more force/strength to use more energy to move the object more distance or do more work in the same time frame.

If not, HOW can the object move faster and further in the same time frame if you don’t use more force/strength ?

Wayne
 
I would like another try here please, as I am not sure if the members seemed to understand my question, which is above and below. No one actualy told me how much force was used and how/why ? As we do know that in the below you fail roughly 50% faster in doing the faster reps, thus this would mean you are putting more tension on the muscles as of the more force used.

Question, which uses the more force,
A,
As I have say lifted the 80 pounds up and down 1m for 6 times in 6 seconds, I have moved the weight 12m in all, but the slower repper has only lifted their weight 2m in 6 seconds, as I have lifted the same weight 10m more in the same time frame, “how” can the slow repper have used as much total or overall force ?

B,
In .5 of a second I have moved the weight 1000mm, the slower repper on the other hand has moved the weight only 166mm, just tell me HOW you think you have used the exact same force, but only moved the weight one sixth of what I have moved it. DO NOT YOU AGREE THAT I HAVE USED MORE FORCE/STRENGTH TO DO THIS ? AND IF NOT WHY ? HOW CAN WHAT YOU THINK, THE SAME FORCE MOVE THE SAME OBJECT IN THE SAME TIME FRAME 166MM AND 1000MM ? ITS JUST IMPOSSIBLE.


C,
Impulse. When a force is applied to a weight, it changes the movement of that body. A small force applied for a long time can produce the same movement change as a large force applied briefly, because it is the product of the force and the time for which it is applied that is important. BUT BOTH THESE FORCES ARE USED FOR THE SAME TIME, the only way the slower force could catch up if it went on longer, then it would move the weight the same distance.









Problem,
I lift 80% or 80 pounds of my 1RM {repetition maximum} 1m up and 1m down 6 times in 6 seconds, they lift 80% or 80 pounds of their 1RM {repetition maximum} 1m up and 1m down 1 time in 6 seconds, who uses the most overall or total force, or who puts the most tension on the muscles in the 6 seconds

Wayne
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top