Average kinetic energy of a damped oscillator

AI Thread Summary
The average kinetic energy of a damped mechanical oscillator is expressed as half of the total energy, which consists of kinetic and potential energy components. The total energy is defined by the equation E = (1/2)m v^2 + (1/2)k x^2, where k is the spring constant. The concept of energy oscillating between kinetic and potential forms supports this average. A formal approach to calculating the average value of a function over an interval is presented, emphasizing the relationship between the average height of a rectangle and the area under the curve. This discussion highlights the mathematical foundation behind the average kinetic energy in damped oscillators.
MuIotaTau
Messages
82
Reaction score
3
For a damped mechanical oscillator, the energy of the system is given by $$E = \frac{1}{2}m \dot{x}^2 + \frac{1}{2}k x^2$$ where ##k## is the spring constant. From there, I've seen it dictated that the average kinetic energy ##\langle T \rangle ## is half of the total energy of the system. This makes sense, since the energy sort of "sloshes" back and forth between kinetic and potential energy, but is there a more formal way to show this is true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if you have ##y=f(x)## then the average value of ##y## in ##a<x<b## is the height of a rectangle with the same area as the graph of ##y## vs ##x## in that region. $$y_{avg}=\frac{1}{b-a}\int_a^b f(x)\;\text{d}x$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Oh, that's simple! Thank you!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top