Average value of components of angular momentum for a wave packet

Nelsonc
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Given a wave packet as shown (see below), find the mean value of angular momentum components L_x, L_y, L_z with regard to point (a,0,-b) where a and b (the impact parameter) are nonzero
Relevant Equations
\frac{1}{\pi^{3/4} \sqrt{\sigma_x\sigma_y\sigma_z}}e^{-(x^2/2{\sigma_x}^2+y^2/2{\sigma_y}^2+z^2/2{\sigma_z}^2)}e^{i(p_0/\hbar)x}
I have typed up the main problem in latex (see photo below)
problem.png

It seems all such integrals evaluates to 0, but that is apparantly unreasonable for in classical mechanics such a free particle is with nonzero angular momentum with respect to y axis.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nelsonc said:
It seems all such integrals evaluates to 0, but that is apparantly unreasonable for in classical mechanics such a free particle is with nonzero angular momentum with respect to y axis.
You didn't show your work for the y and z components of angular momentum. You shouldn't get zero for the y component.
 
Thanks for the reminder, but I have already done so and it turns out they all goes to 0, so there must be something awry with my method. In particular, there seems always to be one spacial part of the integrand to be antisymmetric so that the whole integral goes to 0 (please refer to the image attached). Moreover, I know that classically a free particle moving in such fashion would have y angular momentum component being ##bp_0##

problem_2.png
 
In deriving equation (7), check your result for ##\large \frac{\partial \psi'}{\partial x}##. Did you use the product rule when taking the derivative of the product of the Gaussian function and the function ##e^{i(p_0/\hbar)x}##?
 
I see, thanks so much for catching that error! Now the calculation generates ##bp_0## as a result.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top