Average value of components of angular momentum for a wave packet

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the evaluation of angular momentum components for a wave packet, specifically addressing the y and z components. Participants noted that the integrals for these components initially evaluated to zero, which contradicts classical mechanics where a free particle possesses non-zero angular momentum about the y-axis. The issue was traced back to an antisymmetric part of the integrand, leading to the zero result. A correction was made by applying the product rule correctly in the derivative of the wave function, resulting in the expected value of angular momentum, ##bp_0##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and wave packets
  • Familiarity with angular momentum in classical mechanics
  • Proficiency in calculus, particularly differentiation techniques
  • Knowledge of LaTeX for mathematical expression
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of wave packets in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about angular momentum operators in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the product rule in calculus and its applications in physics
  • Investigate the implications of antisymmetry in integrals
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, physicists analyzing wave packets, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of angular momentum in both classical and quantum contexts.

Nelsonc
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Given a wave packet as shown (see below), find the mean value of angular momentum components L_x, L_y, L_z with regard to point (a,0,-b) where a and b (the impact parameter) are nonzero
Relevant Equations
\frac{1}{\pi^{3/4} \sqrt{\sigma_x\sigma_y\sigma_z}}e^{-(x^2/2{\sigma_x}^2+y^2/2{\sigma_y}^2+z^2/2{\sigma_z}^2)}e^{i(p_0/\hbar)x}
I have typed up the main problem in latex (see photo below)
problem.png

It seems all such integrals evaluates to 0, but that is apparantly unreasonable for in classical mechanics such a free particle is with nonzero angular momentum with respect to y axis.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nelsonc said:
It seems all such integrals evaluates to 0, but that is apparantly unreasonable for in classical mechanics such a free particle is with nonzero angular momentum with respect to y axis.
You didn't show your work for the y and z components of angular momentum. You shouldn't get zero for the y component.
 
Thanks for the reminder, but I have already done so and it turns out they all goes to 0, so there must be something awry with my method. In particular, there seems always to be one spacial part of the integrand to be antisymmetric so that the whole integral goes to 0 (please refer to the image attached). Moreover, I know that classically a free particle moving in such fashion would have y angular momentum component being ##bp_0##

problem_2.png
 
In deriving equation (7), check your result for ##\large \frac{\partial \psi'}{\partial x}##. Did you use the product rule when taking the derivative of the product of the Gaussian function and the function ##e^{i(p_0/\hbar)x}##?
 
I see, thanks so much for catching that error! Now the calculation generates ##bp_0## as a result.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
9K