Average Velocity and Constant Acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The formula Vav=(Vi+Vf)/2 is not exclusively valid for constant acceleration, as it can also apply to variable acceleration under certain conditions. A graph of velocity versus time illustrates that the area under the curve represents distance traveled, which can be the same for different velocity functions. If the area under the curve from initial to final velocity remains constant, the average velocity will also remain the same. Thus, the average velocity can be derived from various shapes of velocity-time graphs, not just those representing constant acceleration. This demonstrates that the average velocity formula is more versatile than initially suggested.
Ali Asadullah
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
Can some one please prove that Vav=(Vi+Vf)/2 is valid only for constant acceleration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ali Asadullah said:
Can some one please prove that Vav=(Vi+Vf)/2 is valid only for constant acceleration?
No, because it isn't valid only for constant acceleration. There are other velocity functions that also yield this average velocity.
 
Ali Asadullah said:
Can some one please prove that Vav=(Vi+Vf)/2 is valid only for constant acceleration?
It's posible for Vav=(Vi+Vf)/2 to be true for variable acceleration as well. Start off with a graph of velocity (y axis) versus time (x axis). Then the area below the horizontal line that goes from {t0, Vav} to {t1, Vav} = Vav x (t1 - t0) = the distance traveled. Then note that any line of any shape with the same amount of area under the line from {t0, Vi} to {t1, Vf} would also have the same average velocity as constant acceleration.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top