Prob/Stats Axiomatic Set Theory: Book Recommendations?

AI Thread Summary
Axiomatic set theory requires a solid foundation in mathematics, including abstract algebra and real analysis, before tackling Gödel's theorems. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the historical and philosophical context of mathematics to grasp the motivations behind axiomatic set theory. Recommended readings include Pinter's "A Book of Abstract Algebra," Bloch's "The Real Numbers and Real Analysis," and Stillwell's "The Real Numbers: An Introduction to Set Theory and Analysis." For those specifically interested in Gödel's work, Gensler's "Gödel's Theorem Simplified" is suggested as an accessible starting point. Engaging with these resources will enhance comprehension and intuition in the field.
UncertaintyAjay
Messages
230
Reaction score
31
So I just finished "Book of Proof" and I'm looking for a more rigourous book on axiomatic set theory, including Gödel's theorems.Any recommendations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, Gödel's theorems are not a part of set theory, they are rather a part of mathematical logic.

If you just finished book of proof, then you are likely not ready to tackle Gödel's theorems or axiomatic set theory. I'm sure you could formally understand the notions though. But you wouldn't understand the underlying motivations and intuition. For example, why was axiomatic set theory necessary, and what exactly is Gödel's theorems about? This requires some familiarity with the rest of mathematics. Furthermore, if you finished the book of proof, then you are likely not very skilled in proofs yet.

So what I propose is to first learn a bit on abstract algebra and real analysis. This will help you greatly to obtain more intuition for set theory and Gödel. Furthermore, I encourage you to read up on the history and philosophy of mathematics. Gödel is merely the last chapter in a story that has been going on since the ancient Greeks! So knowing the full story is important.

Some good books to read:
Pinter's "A book of abstract algebra" https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486474178/?tag=pfamazon01-20
This is necessary because abstract structures such as groups and rings will be generalized in mathematical logic. So it is good to be acquainted with such structures first, before seeing the generalization.

Bloch's "The real numbers and real analysis" https://www.amazon.com/dp/0387721762/?tag=pfamazon01-20
This book is good because it develops mathematics from the ground up. It only accepts sets as given, and then it builds the natural, integers, rational numbers and real numbers. It goes on to develop most of calculus rigorously. This book is necessary because you need to understand what questions set theory wanted to answer. Knowing the Peano axioms and the construction of the real numbers is absolutely crucial for that. Not an easy book though!

Stillwell's "The real numbers : an introduction to set theory and analysis" https://www.amazon.com/dp/3319015761/?tag=pfamazon01-20
This book starts with some very foundational questions important to set theory, and then answers them. Stillwell is a great writer too!

Kline's "Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times, Vol 1 and 2" https://www.amazon.com/dp/0195061357/?tag=pfamazon01-20
Very comprehensive history of mathematics. Very worth reading. You don't need to read all of them of course, but it's important to get a historical grasp on what questions were important in set theory.

Gensler: "Gödel's theorem simplified" https://www.amazon.com/dp/081913869X/?tag=pfamazon01-20
If you're interested in Gödel's theorem (or one of them), then there is no better book to start than this. It is quite easy, but very worth reading.

Do not hesitate to contact me for more questions or for guidance!
 
Thanks a lot. Looks like I have a lot to catch up on. :p
 
If you want set theory, I recall that Jech/Hrbacek is quite decent, if concise. Just don't accidentally get Jech's graduate book on set theory, that would be way too advanced.

If you want a wordier book, Suppes is nice because he proves every theorem in the book, so it's nice to try to prove them yourself to gain confidence.
 
verty said:
If you want set theory, I recall that Jech/Hrbacek is quite decent, if concise. Just don't accidentally get Jech's graduate book on set theory, that would be way too advanced.

Hrbacek and Jech is awesome. It's still my favorite book on axiomatic set theory.

If you want a wordier book, Suppes is nice because he proves every theorem in the book, so it's nice to try to prove them yourself to gain confidence.

A word of warning: I have seen a few people who read Suppes and who somehow were very misinformed about things. I don't know why that is, because the book really is decent. I just think it is not safe to self-study things like this.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
889
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Back
Top