Baby Rudin continuity problem question

  • Thread starter Thread starter genericusrnme
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem from Baby Rudin regarding the continuity of a real function f defined on R, given that the limit of the difference quotient approaches zero as n approaches zero. It is concluded that this condition does not imply continuity, as it only indicates the absence of simple discontinuities, meaning that the left-hand and right-hand limits at any point are equal. An example is provided where a function can have a simple discontinuity despite meeting the limit condition. The participants clarify the distinction between having equal one-sided limits and actual continuity at a point. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the nuances of continuity in real analysis.
genericusrnme
Messages
618
Reaction score
2
Sup guys, I was just going over my Baby Rudin and I came across a problem that I don't really know how to get started on.

Suppose f is a real function defined on R that satisfies, for all x Limit_{n\ \rightarrow \ 0} (f(x+n)-f(x-n)) = 0, does this imply f is continuous?

My first thoughts are that no, it doesn't imply f is continuous, it just implies that f doesn't have any simple discontinuities since f(x_+) = f_(x_-). I don't know how I can go about showing this though..

Could anyone nudge me in the right direction?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi genericusrnme! :smile:
genericusrnme said:
… it just implies that f doesn't have any simple discontinuities …

does it ? :wink:
 
Well, what, exactly, do you mean by a "simple" discontinuity? If f(x)= 1 for all x except 0 and f(0)= 0, that looks like a pretty simple discontinuity to me!
 
tiny-tim said:
hi genericusrnme! :smile:


does it ? :wink:

Ah yes, you're completely right
f(x+) = f(x-) but f(x+) isn't necessarily equal to f(x)

HallsofIvy said:
Well, what, exactly, do you mean by a "simple" discontinuity? If f(x)= 1 for all x except 0 and f(0)= 0, that looks like a pretty simple discontinuity to me!

Yep, I just got that

Thanks guys!
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top