Bad Math Jokes

  • Thread starter Thread starter benorin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jokes
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
447 replies · 49K views
Ibix said:
Less dark than my approach...
Yeah, same here.
 
Reply
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu, pinball1970, Ibix and 1 other person
Physics news on Phys.org
Ibix said:
Less dark than my approach...
Well, given the the position of the knife...

Blond Boy: "Hey, we could have just thrown away one of the apple halves!'

Brown-Haired Girl: "Hmm, I didn't think of that..."
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and BillTre
First, pick up the knife, then think.

You don't have to swim faster than a crocodile, only faster than the slowest member in your group.
 
Reply
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and berkeman
No issues with maths and I suppose it is going to me that has to say it out loud.
Cut one apple in half for the chaps and give the lady the full one, we all know they would not hear the last of it otherwise.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
Auld Lang Sine :music:

Should unit circle be plot out
while using axis Y,
The unit circle thee plot out
is a graph entitled 'sine()'

A graph entitled sine, my love,
A graph entitled sine!
A classic trigonomic set
is a graph entitled "sine()"

-- An original just now by my daughter

Happy New Year all! :partytime:
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu, Borg, BillTre and 2 others
Happy New Year!

Your daughter wins the poetry of math competition. The next best entry was from ChatGPT:

As the year comes to a close,
We say goodbye to all that's been,
But before we turn the page and start anew,
We sing a song that never fails to renew:
The words of "Auld Lang Syne" ring true,
As we celebrate the old, and look forward to the new,
With memories of friends and loved ones dear,
We raise a glass and bring in the new year
The sin and cos of time have brought us here,
To this moment, bright and clear,
We stand together, hand in hand,
Ready to face whatever this new year has planned.
So let us sing and dance and cheer,
As we bid farewell to the old year,
And welcome in the new with open hearts and minds,
For auld lang syne, we'll leave behind.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu and Halc
pemdas.gif
 
Reply
  • Haha
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude, pinball1970 and berkeman
fresh_42 said:
If you have a string of final length and call this length 1, then you need irrational portions of such strings to make a circumference.

If you have a string that makes a circumference and you call its length 1, then the part of it that represents the diameter is irrational.

You cannot have both at the same time.
...because that would be irrational.

(Sorry - could not resist, but didn't want to pollute thread.)
 
Reply
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur, BillTre and berkeman
jedishrfu said:
Those 2% folks drink a lot of milk.
In the UK we would say, they have had their Weetabix. I looked on the internet this afternoon to try and find a good maths joke for pf, my favourites are mathematician, physicist, Engineer jokes.

I tried quite a few sites (lunch hour) and I realised I had read all of them in one form or another on pf.
 
True story: The first time a physics professor walked in and started talking about canonical coordinates, for a moment I thought he meant conical coordinates but had been drinking.

Moral of the story: Read the material before class.
 
Reply
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur
or wear a cone hat?

My friend and physics coconspirator liked to ask me questions after our tests which I didn't like to answer. In one case he asked about some problem and said he got x=... y=... and z=... and my reply but it was a 2D problem... mic drop...
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur
You take a third way, pulling the lever, but only half way, derailing the trolley.
 
Reply
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Ivan Seeking, pinball1970, Wrichik Basu and 1 other person
Ivan Seeking said:
Both a math AND a philosophy joke

View attachment 321578

But isn't it true that you can make a one-to-one mapping from one set to the other? Which would make both sets the same size?

OTOH, if they had somehow been grouped as 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ..., would a zombie rise from the grave that is 1/12 alive?
 
Swamp Thing said:
But isn't it true that you can make a one-to-one mapping from one set to the other? Which would make both sets the same size?

OTOH, if they had somehow been grouped as 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ..., would a zombie rise from the grave that is 1/12 alive?
-1/12!
Edit: wow another 20 year member!
 
Last edited:
Swamp Thing said:

I thought he was going to rescue everyone, that's no fun though!
 
Last edited:
Swamp Thing said:
But isn't it true that you can make a one-to-one mapping from one set to the other? Which would make both sets the same size?
No, that is the point made. There is no such map. The real numbers are more than the integers.
 
1cjmaja759fa1.jpg
 
Reply
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude, Ivan Seeking, jack action and 3 others
The concept of sacrifice seems to be fundamental to human reasoning, and is often rewarded by the community.

A leader's survival is predicated upon their ability to manipulate others into a position of self-sacrifice.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ivan Seeking
Swamp Thing said:
But isn't it true that you can make a one-to-one mapping from one set to the other? Which would make both sets the same size?

OTOH, if they had somehow been grouped as 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ..., would a zombie rise from the grave that is 1/12 alive?

Unless the people are infinitesimally small, both choices lead to a finite number of people run over. Rather, the second choice can't exist in a reasonable model. Well neither can in reality, but the second choice can't exist more!

The main flaw I mean to point out is that there will never exist a time when the number of people the train has run over is non-finite (at least in the first case for sure).

If we can assume the question asker just made a conceptual mistake in terms of confusing unboundedness and infinity, but we can still trust that an uncountable infinity of people were lined up on the second track, then we can assume those people are infinitesimal, and infinitesimal people cannot be harmed by being run over. So in that case, the least harmful choice is to switch tracks.
 
Last edited: