Baez TWF #243 is out (talks about Derek Wise Cartan paper)

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paper
marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
794
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week243.html
==sample quote==
...in the meantime, we can think about mathematical physics. My student Derek Wise is graduating this year, and he's doing his thesis on Cartan geometry, MacDowell-Mansouri gravity and BF theory. Let me say a little about this paper of his:

11) Derek Wise, MacDowell-Mansouri gravity and Cartan geometry, available as gr-qc/0611154.

Elie Cartan is one of the most influential of 20th-century geometers. At one point he had an intense correspondence with Einstein on general relativity. His "Cartan geometry" idea is an approach to the concept of parallel transport that predates the widely used Ehresmann approach (connections on principal bundles). It simultaneously generalizes Riemannian geometry and Klein's Erlangen program (see "week213"), in which geometries are described by their symmetry groups:
Code:
         EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY  ------------->  KLEIN GEOMETRY

               |                                  |
               |                                  |
               |                                  |
               |                                  |
               v                                  v

        RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY  --------------> CARTAN GEOMETRY
Given all this, it's somewhat surprising how few physicists know about Cartan geometry!

Recognizing this, Derek explains Cartan geometry from scratch before showing how it underlies the so-called MacDowell-Mansouri approach to general relativity. This plays an important role both in supergravity and Freidel and Starodubtsev's work on quantum gravity (see "week235") - but until now, it's always seemed like a "trick".

What's the basic idea? Derek explains it all very clearly, so I'll just provide a quick sketch. Cartan describes the geometry of a lumpy bumpy space by saying what it would be like to roll a nice homogeneous "model space" on it. Homogeneous spaces are what Klein studied; now Cartan takes this idea and runs with it... or maybe we should say he rolls with it!

For example, we could study the geometry of a lumpy bumpy surface by rolling a plane on it...
===end quote===

we were waiting for this TWF. Several threads here about Derek's paper and related things.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
marcus said:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week243.html
==sample quote==
...in the meantime, we can think about mathematical physics. My student Derek Wise is graduating this year, and he's doing his thesis on Cartan geometry, MacDowell-Mansouri gravity and BF theory. Let me say a little about this paper of his:

11) Derek Wise, MacDowell-Mansouri gravity and Cartan geometry, available as gr-qc/0611154.

Elie Cartan is one of the most influential of 20th-century geometers. At one point he had an intense correspondence with Einstein on general relativity. His "Cartan geometry" idea is an approach to the concept of parallel transport that predates the widely used Ehresmann approach (connections on principal bundles). It simultaneously generalizes Riemannian geometry and Klein's Erlangen program (see "week213"), in which geometries are described by their symmetry groups:
Code:
         EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY  ------------->  KLEIN GEOMETRY

               |                                  |
               |                                  |
               |                                  |
               |                                  |
               v                                  v

        RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY  --------------> CARTAN GEOMETRY
Given all this, it's somewhat surprising how few physicists know about Cartan geometry!

Recognizing this, Derek explains Cartan geometry from scratch before showing how it underlies the so-called MacDowell-Mansouri approach to general relativity. This plays an important role both in supergravity and Freidel and Starodubtsev's work on quantum gravity (see "week235") - but until now, it's always seemed like a "trick".

What's the basic idea? Derek explains it all very clearly, so I'll just provide a quick sketch. Cartan describes the geometry of a lumpy bumpy space by saying what it would be like to roll a nice homogeneous "model space" on it. Homogeneous spaces are what Klein studied; now Cartan takes this idea and runs with it... or maybe we should say he rolls with it!

For example, we could study the geometry of a lumpy bumpy surface by rolling a plane on it...
===end quote===

we were waiting for this TWF. Several threads here about Derek's paper and related things.

It is a very helpful article I must say. Some beautiful pictures are used to describe how geometry works and the small story with the hamster is absolutely nice. I am not sure that I did understand everything in details but the main ideas are clear, also for me. Now my only problem here is: in which way can we compare ourself with this hamster roling on the Riemanian surface? I get a better acceptance with this description when I replace the hamster by a wave with a permanently changing polarization encountering "a priori" any local geometry... Do you think that my remark makes sense? Otherwise the MacDowell Mansouri approach appears to be very interesting for my own one ...
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top