Balance Equations Using Half-Cell Method

  • Thread starter Thread starter ipl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on balancing redox reactions using the half-cell method, emphasizing the identification of oxidation and reduction processes. Participants are guided to determine oxidation states for each atom in the reactants and products to identify which species are oxidized and reduced. The method involves writing half-reactions for oxidation and reduction, balancing mass by adding water and H+ ions, and ensuring charge balance by including electrons where necessary. The final step is to combine the half-reactions, adjusting coefficients if the electron counts do not match. This approach provides a systematic way to balance complex redox equations effectively.
ipl
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Balance the following equations by the half-cell method.Show both half-cell reactions and identify them as oxidation or reduction.
a) SO_3^2- + MnO_4^- +H^+ <- ->Mn^2+ SO_4^2- +H_2O(l)
b) Cl_2(g) + OH^- <- -> Cl^- + ClO_3^- +H_2O(l)
c) SO_4^2- +I^- +H+ <- -> S^2- + I_2(s) + H_2O (l)

I honestly don't know where to start so if you could show me all the steps, I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey, I just did this in class like two days ago! :)

All right, I need a little background. How much do you know? Oxidation vs reduction? OILRIG? Anything?

The quick way:

  1. Find out what's oxidized and what's reduced: calculate the oxidation # for each atom in the reactant side and then compare that with the oxidation # for each atom on the product side. If something has a loss of electrons, it's oxidized. If it something has a gain of electrons, it's reduced. Now, there are certain "rules" about oxidation that should be listed in your chemistry book (if you have one). One of them is that oxygen always has a charge of (2-) except in peroxides (O-O single bond). I mention these because this way, you don't HAVE to compare the oxidation # of every single atom on both sides, just the ones that are likely to change.
  2. Write an equation that shows the JUST oxidation/reduction of each reactant. So for example:

    SO_3^2- <<<<<<------>>>>>> SO_4^2-

    Now remember, you need one for the sulfate and also one for the permanganate. But you see how the mass on the equation above is NOT balanced? Balance that by adding water (H_2O) to the oxygen-deficient side. For every water added on the oxygen-deficient side, add two H+ ions on the other side. This is "allowed" because these reactions are usually done in water, so we can grab H+s and H_2Os from the solution. Doing this will also keep the mass balanced. :)

    Now you'll get an equation with the MASSES balanced, but the charges not. Looking at the sulfur half-cell reaction: include electrons on whichever side it is needed (on the positive side to make the equation balance charge-wise in terms of the sulfur). You might think "the charge is equal on both sides!" Yes, the OVERALL charge is the same on both sides, but look at the charge of the sulfur. See how it's changed, if O is always (2-)? Do this exact same thing for the permanganate. You will now have two equations which are your balanced half-cell equations, balanced in both charge and mass.

    Add the two equations together. If the electron counts do NOT cancel, make them. :) By that I mean multiplying one (or maybe both) reactions by some coefficients.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
42
Views
14K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top