Balanced Equation: 2S(s)+3O2(g) ----> 2SO3(g): Correct Interpretation

  • Thread starter Thread starter ProblemSets
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Study
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on interpreting the balanced chemical equation 2S(s) + 3O2(g) → 2SO3(g). Participants analyze different interpretations, identifying option C as incorrect because the coefficients represent moles, not grams. There is uncertainty regarding option B, specifically whether it accurately represents atoms versus molecules. The consensus suggests that option A correctly interprets the coefficients in terms of moles. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the distinction between moles, atoms, and grams in chemical equations.
ProblemSets
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Which of the following is an INCORRECT interpretation of the balanced equation shown below?

2S(s) + 3O2(g) ----> 2SO3(g)



a.) 2 mol S + 3 mol O2 ----> 2 mol SO3
b.) 2 atoms S + 3 molecules O2 ----> 2 molecules SO3
c.) 2 g S + 3 g O2 ----> 2 g SO3
d.)none of the above
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So what do you think?

Note: this question should have been posted in the Homework Forum.
 
Do you understand that different elements have different atomic masses?
 
i think that the answer is c?
 
Last edited:
ProblemSets said:
i think that the answer is c?
...Why? ...
 
coefficients symbolize the number of moles so A would be correct.

Then I am not 100% sure about B cause the molecules seem to be right but I am not sure about the atoms of S and if that is a correct interpretation.

And for C, I don't think that the coefficients can stand for grams cause there are multiple grams in a mole.

How is my thinking?
 

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Chemistry Homework Help: Calculating Mass from Chemical Reaction Equations
Replies
4
Views
2K
What Is the Molarity of Potassium Ions in a Potassium Sulfite Solution?
Replies
2
Views
4K
Chemistry How do we interpret the steps in the algorithm to balance a redox equation?
Replies
7
Views
2K
Chemistry Understanding the calculation of enthalpy of the formation of benzene
Replies
3
Views
2K
Chemistry How to apply Nernst equation in this problem?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Chemistry Calculating the Mass of a Precipitate
Replies
14
Views
11K
Chemistry How to find the pH of a galvanic cell (MIT OCW problem set)
Replies
2
Views
3K
Calculating ΔH Using Hess's Law for FeO(s)CO(g) Reaction
Replies
4
Views
2K
[Kinetics] Using Rate as a Conversion Factor
Replies
4
Views
2K
Chemistry Calculating the number of water molecules in trans. metal complex
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top