Balancing Redox Reactions in Basic Solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter RoKe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Redox
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on balancing the redox reaction for the formation of hydrazine from ammonia and chloramine in a basic solution. The balanced equation is NH3 + NH2Cl + OH- -> N2H4 + Cl- + H2O, with coefficients of 1 for NH3, OH-, and N2H4. The method used, which involved balancing hydrogen with OH- instead of H+, is confirmed as correct for basic conditions. The participants agree that different equations may require various balancing techniques, but the approach taken here is valid. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of adapting methods to the specific conditions of the reaction.
RoKe
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Formation of Hydrazine from Ammonia and Chloramine in basic solution.
NH3 + NH2Cl -> N2H4 + Cl-
What are the coefficients of NH3, OH-, and N2H4 in the balanced equation?
I basically just balanced the hydrogens with an H+, then those with OH-, and got:
NH3 + NH2Cl + OH- ->N2H4 + Cl- + H2O
This is the right answer according to my answer sheet (1, 1 and 1), I was just wondering if this is the correct method. I'm not sure how I would use a half-reaction method here and at my university it's recommended we do not use the oxidation number method. Any explanations on how to approach these problems would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you've done works just fine. When the question states that the reaction is happening under basic (or alkaline) conditions, you want the equation to involve OH- rather than H+, as you finally have.

The reason what you did worked is because H was the only unbalanced species in the given equation; all other elements were balanced.

Different equations are best solved using different tools (by simply matching numbers of atoms, or using the oxidation number method, or using the half reaction method). In this case, I would have done it the same way you did.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Back
Top