Ball Drop Question: How High Will It Go?

  • Thread starter Thread starter llee8820
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Drop
AI Thread Summary
A ball with a mass of 0.35 kg is initially at a height of 1.1 meters and moving upwards at 1.3 m/s. The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum height the ball will reach, using energy conservation principles and kinematic equations. One participant initially used the potential and kinetic energy equations but arrived at an incorrect height of 1.186 m. Another suggested using the kinematic equation, which led to a correct calculation of 1.014 m. Ultimately, the confusion stemmed from algebraic errors in the initial calculations, highlighting the importance of careful arithmetic in physics problems.
llee8820
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A ball of mass 0.35 kilograms is currently 1.1 meters off the floor and has a speed of 1.3 meters per second straight up. Assuming no energy is converted by air friction, how high will the ball go?


Homework Equations


PE=mgh
KE=1/2mv^2


The Attempt at a Solution


Since there is no friction or work, i set the equation as mgh=mgx+1/2mv^2, solving for x(final height) but I get the wrong answer. And I'm pretty sure this is the right equation to use.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes I think that's a way to do it, maybe typo on calculator. I got 1.186m
 
ice ace said:
yes I think that's a way to do it, maybe typo on calculator. I got 1.186m

1.186? How did u get that? These are the values I plugged in.
(.35*1.1*9.81)=(9.81*.35*x)+(.5*.35*1.3^2)
From this x=(((.35*1.1*9.81)-(.(5*.35*1.3^2))/(9.81*.35)
Using a Ti-83, and not rounding any answers, I get 1.014.

Im confused...
 
i think easier way is to use kinematics equation : vf^2=vi^2+2ad then add 1.1m with d to get it
 
ice ace said:
i think easier way is to use kinematics equation : vf^2=vi^2+2ad then add 1.1m with d to get it

Yup that did it. Thanks! Though I'm still wondering why my equations didn't work. O well, thanks for help
 
OMG nvm I'm a idiot. I can't do basic algebra -_____-, mine equation does work
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top