Optimizing Friction for Safe Highway Curves

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum coefficient of friction required for vehicles to safely navigate a banked highway curve designed for 60 km/h traffic, while the actual speed is 35 km/h on a rainy day. Participants highlight the lack of information regarding the banking angle, which complicates the problem. They suggest using equations related to centripetal force and friction, noting the need for assumptions due to insufficient data. One approach proposed is to express the coefficient of friction as a ratio between wet and dry conditions, simplifying the calculations. The conversation emphasizes the challenges of solving the problem without additional information.
blueray4
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A banked circular highway curve is designed for traffic moving at 60 km/h. The radius of the curve is 230 m. Traffic is moving along the highway at 35 km/h on a rainy day. What is the minimum coefficient of friction between tires and road that will allow cars to negotiate the turn without sliding off the road?



Homework Equations


NO IDEA.


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have any thoughts on how to solve it or even what eqns might be useful. This is la lot like an incline-block problem, with centripetal force thrown in.
 
maybe find the angle of the curve? i honestly have no clue...
 
Lets see if I can help. First problem is it suggests the turn is banked but gives no angle of the banking. So maybe the problem designer hinted at what it might be. He says safely negotiated at 60km/hr. Ok, so we have more data. with 230 m radius, we could calculate, the bank of the turn if we knew the coefficient of friction, or vice versa. From there we could figure the wet coefficient and be done.


This is where the problem gets nasty and assumption laden. Is there any more data, besides that given?
 
no , nothing else
 
hells bells. All i can add at this time is to call the angle of the bank theta.

We know that sin(theta)*g=V^2/R -mu(dry)*cos(theta).

and that when wet, sin(theta)*g=V'^2/R'-mu(wet)*cos(theta)

Two eqns, 3 unknowns. Anyone else out there with another approach?
 
Looks good if you assume a wet tire will grab equally well as a dry one, try telling that to a race car driver!

It seems assumed this is not the case by the way the question was worded. If your stuck for time, I would try to express the coefficient of friction as a ratio between wet and dry coefficients of friction. Then the banking angle no longer matters and it becomes a simple ratio.
 
Back
Top