Basic algebra responsible for brain fart

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving for x in a chemical equilibrium problem represented by the equation 5.10 = [(1+x)/(1-x)]^2. The main issue is the difficulty in obtaining the correct value for x, which is known to be 0.387. Participants clarify that while taking the square root of both sides is valid, it requires careful consideration of the positive and negative roots, especially since x represents a concentration that must remain within physical constraints. The conversation emphasizes that negative solutions may arise but are not applicable in this context, reinforcing the importance of understanding the implications of the equation's structure. Ultimately, the correct approach involves using the quadratic form derived from cross-multiplying, leading to the valid solution for x.
MurdocJensen
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm trying to solve for x in a chemical equilibrium problem (college chem). Once x is found I have no problem finding equilibrium concentrations. What's important is below.

Homework Equations



5.10 = [(1+x)/(1-x)]^2 --------> x=.387 (right answer)

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried to take the square root of the right side and cross multiply and solve for x that way, but I keep getting 1. I also tried to expand the numerator with the common denominator to see if I missed something, but solving for x that way eventually got me 1 also. I know there's something simple I'm missing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cross multiplying should work. Then you can work out the squares (don't forget that (x + 1)^2 = x^2 + 2x + 1) and bring it to the form
a x^2 + b x + c = 0.
 
That worked awesomely! What I don't understand is why I wasn't able to work it out by taking the square root of both sides. Do you have any insight into that? Not sure if that question's too vague.
 
You can do that, but you may need to consider both positive and negative square root of 5.10,
 
Physical constraints may tell you that x must be positive - and, if x represents a concentration (I can't tell from your original question) then you know 0 < x < 1, and solving by taking square roots works fine, without the need to consider -\sqrt{5.10}
 
That's not true statdad. The equation
\frac{1 + x}{1 - x} = -\sqrt{5.10}
can still give a positive solution for x (there is a minus sign in the denominator) and, in fact, will.
 
CompuChip said:
That's not true statdad. The equation
\frac{1 + x}{1 - x} = -\sqrt{5.10}
can still give a positive solution for x (there is a minus sign in the denominator) and, in fact, will.

Nope: if 0 < x < 1 as I specified, then

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> 0 &gt; -x &amp; &gt; -1 \\<br /> 1 &gt; 1 - x &amp; &gt; 0<br /> \end{align*}<br />

and no negative term arises.
 
CompuChip said:
That's not true statdad. The equation
\frac{1 + x}{1 - x} = -\sqrt{5.10}
can still give a positive solution for x (there is a minus sign in the denominator) and, in fact, will.
This is correct.
I am guessing this is an equilibrium problem involving an ICE table. If so, then i am going to assume x represents a change in concentration. One of the values obtained for x will not be possible as it will be greater than the initial concentration. Using the positive square-root, the solution should be x=.387. using the negative squareroot, the value for x obtained (if i computed correctly) should be x=2.59. concentrations can be greater than one but if any of the initial concentrations of reagents were smaller than 2.59M, then this value would not be possible, and then the only true solution would be x=.387M (assuming you are working in Molars). MurdocJensen could you post the full question so I could verify this?
Thanks
-Theorem
 

Similar threads

Back
Top