Finding x in cos(x)=exp(-2x): Analytical Solutions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analytical
Swest
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello all

Can anybody see a way to analytically find x in the expression:

cos(x) = exp(-2x)

By inspection x=0 is obvious, and numerically we find x=1.5232 is also a solution, but is there a way to find these values by rearranging the above expression? It's one of those that looks simple but isn't, any ideas?

Many thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That is not "simple" algebra. What you are attempting to do is solve an equation involving two different transcendental functions. In general there is no simple way to do that.
 
Thanks, I suspected as much. Always nice to be reassured that one isn't missing something obvious.
 
graphing them is instructive as it shows the graphs meet infinitely often, at points that become closer and closer to the zeroes of cos(x),

i.e. the solutions approach closer and closer to the integral multiples of pi/2.
 
mathwonk said:
graphing them is instructive as it shows the graphs meet infinitely often, at points that become closer and closer to the zeroes of cos(x),

i.e. the solutions approach closer and closer to the integral multiples of pi/2.

that make sense seeing as for large x the exponential is vanishing.
 
Yes, I did a quick MATLAB plot of the two and saw the trend that you describe, which again can be surmised from inspection, indeed the 2nd solution is very close to pi/2.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top