Basic Dimensional Analysis Question

AI Thread Summary
To convert 1.2 in² to cm², it's essential to use the correct conversion factor. The correct relationship is that 1 in² equals 6.4516 cm², so multiplying 1.2 in² by this factor gives the result in cm². A common mistake is to simply multiply by 2.54, which only converts inches to centimeters without accounting for the area. The proper calculation yields 7.74 cm². Understanding and maintaining units throughout the conversion process is crucial for accurate results.
lolzwhut?
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
1. Convert 1.2 in^2 to cm^2



2. 1 CM = 10^-2 and 1 inch = 2.54 centimeteres



The Attempt at a Solution



Can't we just do 1.2*2.54=3.048 and write that as our answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can't we just do 1.2*2.54=3.048 and write that as our answer?

You could, but it would be wrong. :smile:

If 1 in = 2.54 cm, then, squaring both sides, 12 in2 = 2.542 cm2.

or simplified: 1 in2 = 6.4516 cm2. From this, we get the following facts:

1 = (1 in2) / (6.4516 cm2)

1 = (6.4516 cm2) / (1 in2)

Remember, you can multiply anything by 1 and it will not alter the value you are trying to convert. If you are starting with a value that has units of in2 (as you are) then multiply that value by the ratio of the second equation (that ratio is equal to 1). The in2 will cancel out leaving you with cm2 in the numerator (which is what you want).

1.2 [STRIKE]in2[/STRIKE] * (6.4516 cm2) / (1 [STRIKE]in2[/STRIKE])
 
hi lolzwhut?! :smile:
lolzwhut? said:
1. Convert 1.2 in^2 to cm^2

2. 1 CM = 10^-2 and 1 inch = 2.54 centimeteres

Can't we just do 1.2*2.54=3.048 and write that as our answer?

it's square inches! :wink:
 
lolzwhut? said:
Can't we just do 1.2*2.54=3.048 and write that as our answer?

To add to what lewando wrote - if you were not ignoring units, you would see that it is wrong.

Trying shortcuts when you don't understand what you are doing rarely works. Dimensional analysis strength relies on the fact that it not only gives correct results, but also gives signals if you get lost. However, it works only when you use both numbers and units in conversion coefficients.
 
lolzwhut? said:
1. Convert 1.2 in^2 to cm^2



2. 1 CM = 10^-2

Your first error is here. 1 cm= 10^-2 what?

and 1 inch = 2.54 centimeteres

The Attempt at a Solution



Can't we just do 1.2*2.54=3.048 and write that as our answer?
And, as others have pointed out, you simply dropped the units here and the units are the whole point of the problem.
 
lewando said:
You could, but it would be wrong. :smile:

If 1 in = 2.54 cm, then, squaring both sides, 12 in2 = 2.542 cm2.

or simplified: 1 in2 = 6.4516 cm2. From this, we get the following facts:

1 = (1 in2) / (6.4516 cm2)

1 = (6.4516 cm2) / (1 in2)

Remember, you can multiply anything by 1 and it will not alter the value you are trying to convert. If you are starting with a value that has units of in2 (as you are) then multiply that value by the ratio of the second equation (that ratio is equal to 1). The in2 will cancel out leaving you with cm2 in the numerator (which is what you want).

1.2 [STRIKE]in2[/STRIKE] * (6.4516 cm2) / (1 [STRIKE]in2[/STRIKE])

Wow, so 7.74 cm^2 is what I'm getting.

Thanks for the help guys. I definitely won't forget my units this time xD But yeah, I got 7.74 cm^2.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top