MHB Basic Inequality Prove: $A\leq B\wedge B\leq A \Rightarrow A=B$

  • Thread starter Thread starter solakis1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the statement that if A is less than or equal to B and B is less than or equal to A, then A must equal B. It references the trichotomy law, which asserts that for any two numbers A and B, one of three conditions must hold: A is greater than B, A is less than B, or A equals B. The participants clarify that since A is less than or equal to B, A cannot be greater than B, and since B is less than or equal to A, A cannot be less than B. The equivalence of the trichotomy law to the expression A < B or B < A or A = B is also questioned. The discussion emphasizes the logical structure underpinning the proof of equality based on the given inequalities.
solakis1
Messages
407
Reaction score
0
Prove:

$A\leq B\wedge B\leq A\Rightarrow A=B$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Trichotomy: Given numbers A and B, one and only one must be true:
1) A> B
2) A< B
3) A= B

Since [math]A\le B[/math], A> B is not true.
Since [math]B\le A[/math], A< B is not true.
 
Is the trichotomy law you are using Equivelant to the following:
$A<B\vee B<A\vee A=B$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top