Basic Linear Alegbra for Quantum Mechanics

Peter Yu
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
I do not understand a work example in the book: ‘Quantum Mechanics DeMystified”.

On page 212, part of Example 7-5:

Given: Let { |a> |b> } be an orthonormal two-dimensional basis

Let Operator A be given by:

A = |a>< a |- i| a><b |+ i| b><a |- |b><b |

Then: (The following part I do not understand)

A squared = (|a>< a|- i| a><b |+ i| b><a |- |b><b |) (|a>< a |- i| a><b |+ i| b><a |- |b><b |)

=|a>< a|(|a>< a |) + |a>< a|(- i| a><b |)- i| a><b |( i| b><a |) - i| a><b |(- |b><b |)

+ i| b><a |(|a>< a|) + i| b><a |(- i| a><b |)- |b><b |( i| b><a |)- |b><b |(- |b><b |)

= |a>< a|- i| a><b |+|a>< a|+ i| a><b |+|b><b |+ i| b><a |- i| b><a |+|b><b |

= 2|a>< a| + 2|b><b |

Most grateful if someone could help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter Yu said:
I do not understand a work example in the book: ‘Quantum Mechanics DeMystified”.

On page 212, part of Example 7-5:

Given: Let { |a> |b> } be an orthonormal two-dimensional basis

Let Operator A be given by:

A = |a>< a |- i| a><b |+ i| b><a |- |b><b |

Then: (The following part I do not understand)

A squared = (|a>< a|- i| a><b |+ i| b><a |- |b><b |) (|a>< a |- i| a><b |+ i| b><a |- |b><b |)

=|a>< a|(|a>< a |) + |a>< a|(- i| a><b |)- i| a><b |( i| b><a |) - i| a><b |(- |b><b |)

+ i| b><a |(|a>< a|) + i| b><a |(- i| a><b |)- |b><b |( i| b><a |)- |b><b |(- |b><b |)

= |a>< a|- i| a><b |+|a>< a|+ i| a><b |+|b><b |+ i| b><a |- i| b><a |+|b><b |

= 2|a>< a| + 2|b><b |

Most grateful if someone could help!

Which step is confusing you?

You might try to think about the "bra" and "ket" as vectors that make sense to you, for example 2-D unit vectors

I.e. |a> = column vector (1,0); <a| = row vector (1,0); |b> = column vector (0,1); <b| = row vector (0,1)

Things like <a|a> = 1 = <b|b> -- you can see this easily with the vectors above. Also, <a|b> = <b|a> = 0
 
Thank you for your response.

I am confused by the first step, the every basic Ket - Bra alegbra operation.

For example:

How to do the multiplication of:

|a>< a|(|a>< a |) = ?

|a>< a|( i| b><a |) = ?
 
I assume i is just √-1? Then:
|a>< a|(|a>< a |) =|a>< a|a>< a | = |a>< a |

|a>< a|( i| b><a |) = i|a>< a| b><a | = 0

i is just a number and numbers be moved to the front, back where ever you find convenient.
 
Hi Qiao,
Many Many Thanks! I got it now!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top