Basic physics understanding. Could someone explain?

AI Thread Summary
Understanding derivatives is crucial for grasping basic physics concepts like velocity and acceleration, as they represent the rate of change of position over time. The notation dx/dt signifies the derivative of position with respect to time, which defines instantaneous velocity. A vector is a quantity with both magnitude and direction, such as velocity, which includes both speed and direction. It is recommended to strengthen foundational math skills, particularly calculus, before delving deeper into physics topics. Resources like MIT's 18.01SC course can provide valuable guidance for beginners.
Ultermarto1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to get a grip on some classic physics by watching a Stanford lecture. I've made it through the first one, and now in the second one all the professor ever talks about is 'derivatives' without actually explaining what they are. I guess the Stanford population would be assured with some previous math knowledge.

So anyway, apparently we can work out velocity from position with v = dx / dt, that's velocity equals position over time. Makes sense. We can further work out acceleration with dv / dt, velocity over time. Now why on Earth are there these d's in front of the variables? What exactly is meant by the word 'derivative', and what is a vector? If these questions are too naggy, and I should perhaps be looking at some basic maths before I look at classic physics, could anyone recommend some good starting points (wikipedia is useless for this sort of thing).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Master your school math so that you are ready for these more advanced topics when you get to them. This is Calculus and it relies on most of the math you are learning now. If you think you are ready, then I recommend MIT's 18.01SC course, it is free and does a good job, I think.

I won't say more because there are many threads on these forums that can help.
 
You need to get acquainted with elementary calculus (dx/dt is the derivative of distance with respect to time).
A vector is a quantity which has both magnitude and direction, for example velocity has a speed (how fast) and a direction.
 
Hello Ultermarto1,

The Stanford professor whose class you've watched is using a basic Calculus tool. A derivative of a function like the position x(t) is defined as the following limit:

\frac{dx}{dt}=\mathrm{lim}_{t→t_{o}}\frac{x(t) - x(t_{o})}{t - t_{o}}

And this happens to be exactly the definition of the instantaneous velocity, v(t) of the particle which follows the trajectory given by x(t). So

v(t) = \frac{dx}{dt}(t)

Notice that this is different com the mean velocity, given by

\bar{v} = \frac{\Delta x}{\Delta t} ≠ \frac{dx}{dt}(t)

In fact, if you substitute the last two equations above on the definition of Derivative I wrote in the beginning of this post, you will notice that the instantaneous velocity v(t) is precisely the limit of the mean velocity, \bar{v} when the interval of time under consideration is taken to zero:

\frac{dx}{dt}= v(t) = \mathrm{lim}_{\Delta t→ 0}\frac{\Delta x}{\Delta t}

This is basic Calculus! I would tell you to look for a nice book for starters on this subject and learn it before you go deeper into more complicated physics. ;)


Zag
 
verty said:
Master your school math so that you are ready for these more advanced topics when you get to them. This is Calculus and it relies on most of the math you are learning now. If you think you are ready, then I recommend MIT's 18.01SC course, it is free and does a good job, I think.

I won't say more because there are many threads on these forums that can help.
I'm afraid I'm in college, and not studying any maths at this point. I'll be sure to make a start on calculus, though, if it'll help.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top