Basic Probabilities. Conditional Prob.

Bacle
Messages
656
Reaction score
1
Hi, everyone : I have the following problem:

We have 3 dishwashers X,Y,Z, with the conditions:



1) X washes 40% of dishes, and breaks
1% of the dishes s/he washes.

2)Y washes 30% of the dishes, breaks 1%

3)Z washes 30% of the dishes and breaks 3%.

Question: If a dish is broken: what is the probability that Z broke
the dish.?.

My work:
Events:
E1)Br means "Broke the dish",
E2)X (equiv. Y,Z) means "X ( Equiv. Y,Z) washed the dish.".
E3) (Br|X) means event of dish breaking when X is washing.

Notation:
P(A|B) is conditional probability of B, given A. '/\' means
intersection.


We have : P(Br|X)= 0.01 , P(Br|Y)=0.01 and P(Br|Z)=0.03

P(X)=0.4 , P(Y)=0.3 , P(Z)=0.3


We want to find P(Z|Br), which is equal to P(Z/\Br)/P(Br) , by def. of conditional
probability.


1) First, we find P(Br)=P( (Br/\X)\/(Br/\Y)\/(Br/\Z) )=

P(Br|X)P(X)+P(Br|Y)P(Y)+ p(Br|Z)P(Z)= 0.16

(side question: how do we know that any assignment of probabilities here will

give us P(Br)< =1 ? )


2) P(Z/\Br) =P(Z)P(Br|Z) = (0.3)(0.03)=0.009


3) Using 1,2 above, we get P(Br|Z)= 0.009/0.16= 9/160= 0.05625


But the book has 0.57 as a solution. Could the book have made a mistake.?
Would anyone please check.?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At first glance (without going through the math) you have dropped a power of 10 somewhere...

you may want to redo your calculations
 
Thanks, Noobix.
You mean because Z should be much more likely to have broken the plate than either
X or Y (which would not be the case if P(Z|Br) was 0.057.)?
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top