How Is Ionization Density Expressed in Terms of Charge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CloudChamber
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Ionization density is expressed mathematically as ID = k(Ze)^2, where k represents the constant of proportionality. This formula indicates that ionization density is proportional to the square of the charge (Ze). The discussion highlights a need for clarity in basic mathematical concepts related to ionization. Understanding this relationship is crucial for further studies in physics and chemistry. The formula provides a foundational understanding of how charge affects ionization density.
CloudChamber
Messages
28
Reaction score
1
Hello all,
It seems I've forgotten a lot about basic math since Algebra one. I need some helpcreating a simple formula. I know that ionization density is proportional to the square of the charge (Ze). How would I express this mathematically?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
CloudChamber said:
Hello all,
It seems I've forgotten a lot about basic math since Algebra one. I need some helpcreating a simple formula. I know that ionization density is proportional to the square of the charge (Ze). How would I express this mathematically?


ID = k(Ze)^2 with k being the constant of proportionality

DonAntonio
 

Thread 'Trigonometry problem of interest'

Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
View full post »
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
View full post »
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'

Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'

Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Term for continuously halving a number
Replies
7
Views
3K
B Is Averaging Individual Slopes Equivalent to Linear Regression?
Replies
4
Views
2K
MHB Exercise about the concept of functions
Replies
4
Views
1K
A Probability of resonant ionization
Replies
18
Views
2K
Can You Define "Term" and "Expression" in Math?
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Reframing Light Bending Using Density Instead of Radius
Replies
20
Views
662
I E-field around charged finite wire - intractable or not?
Replies
10
Views
1K
I The electron as a smeared charge density
Replies
13
Views
3K
I Expression, Terms, Factors, Coefficients, Mono/Bi/Poly HELP
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Help with FLP argument of non-uniformly distributed surface charges
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top