Basic question concerning the concept of a work integral

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of work done by a force when moving an object along the x-axis. Initially, a 10N force is applied to move a mass from x=5m to x=2m, resulting in a calculation of +30J of work. However, when evaluating the work as an integral, the force is considered negative due to the direction of movement, leading to a calculation of -30J. This discrepancy highlights the importance of correctly defining the direction of force in work calculations. The conclusion emphasizes that the integral approach correctly accounts for the negative work done when the force opposes the movement.
aftershock
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
Edit: I think I figured it out actually. Left must be negative by the way I introduced the x-axis meaning the force is -10 not 10 when I set up the integral.

Hey guys, this isn't a homework question but solving a homework problem led me to think about this.

Imagine I have a mass situated on the x-axis. The mass is at x=5m, I then apply a 10N force to the object until it is at x=2m.

The force is 10, the distance is 3, they're in the same direction and the angle is zero so I performed +30J of work.

But now if I evaluate it as an integral I can say the force is ∫10dx evaluated from 5 to 2 which becomes 10*2 -10*5 = -30

So the integral tells me I performed negative work:confused: How could that be?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your integral is missing a minus sign, since the force is -10N.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top