Basic thing with general relativity

  • #1
2,112
18
(This could be a dumb question, but in any case I'll be happy if the answer is simple)

I understood that the path of a freely moving object in space satisfies the geodesic equation, but I'm not fully sure how precisely to deal with the four momentum of the object. Have I understood this correctly, if I think that the four momentum is a tangent vector to the path, and that the time evolution of the four momentum is obtained by parallel transport along the path?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
For the 4-momentum to be constant requires ( D is covariant differentation )

[tex]\frac{Dp^{\mu}}{D\tau} = m\frac{D^2x^\mu}{D\tau^2} = 0[/tex]

which is the geodesic equation.

I think your conclusion is correct.
 
  • #3
(This could be a dumb question, but in any case I'll be happy if the answer is simple)

I understood that the path of a freely moving object in space satisfies the geodesic equation, but I'm not fully sure how precisely to deal with the four momentum of the object. Have I understood this correctly, if I think that the four momentum is a tangent vector to the path,

when the path is parameterized by proper time divided by rest mass. If the path is parameterized by proper time, then the tangent vector is the 4-velocity of the object. If some other parameter is used (e.g., the square of the proper time for positive proper time), then the tangent vector to the path is not necessarily easily physically identified.

and that the time evolution of the four momentum is obtained by parallel transport along the path?

Yes, subject to the above.
 
  • #4
I see. With massless objects the path cannot be parametrized by proper time, so there should be something else. Suppose I have some arbitrary parametrization of a path of some object whose mass could be zero or non-zero. If I somehow know correctly the four momentum at some point, will the parallel transport always give the four momentum correctly elsewhere along the path too?
 

Suggested for: Basic thing with general relativity

Replies
15
Views
892
Replies
1
Views
664
Replies
32
Views
437
Replies
55
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
469
Replies
15
Views
627
Replies
17
Views
1K
Back
Top