Basics of quintic and quadratic expressions

AI Thread Summary
Quintic and quadratic expressions are defined by their degree, denoted as n, which indicates the number of potential real roots and changes in direction. Quadratic curves, represented by expressions like (x+1)^2, can have specific characteristics based on their coefficients, such as (x^2+1) having no real roots while (x^2-1) has two. The degree of a polynomial determines the total number of roots, both real and complex, and the relationship between them is that the total will equal n. Additionally, the degree influences the maximum number of changes in direction, with parabolas having a maximum of one change despite their degree. Understanding these fundamentals is crucial for visualizing and analyzing polynomial functions effectively.
runicle
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
<b>I need a brain refresher</b> to see if i have everything straight in quintic and quadratic expressions.

The n's in an expression represents how many turns a line would have
The amount of (x+1)^2 means a quadratic curve
The if the n is odd there are no complex roots

Now here is the problem... my textbook doesn't explain in full detail which kind of expressions have how many discrete, complex and equal real roots.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It helps to visualize these functions. (x^2+1) has no roots over reals, while (x^2-1) has 2 real roots. The degree of the polynomial (Im guessing this is what you mean by n) shows how many potential real roots roots it will have. No matter what, the number of real and imaginary roots will equal n.

The degree can also show how many potential changes in direction there will be. For a parabola (maximum of 2 roots), there can be a maximum of 1 change in direction. These are case specific, though, because x^4 looks exactly like a parabola and only has 1 change in direction. A polynomial of 4th can have a maximum of 4 roots and 3 changes in direction. Compare x^4 with (x+1)x(x-1)(x-2) and (x-2)^4.

This should really be moved to the precalc section
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top