Basis - Complex Vector Space and Real Vector Space

Click For Summary
A basis for a complex vector space X can be transformed into a basis for X as a real vector space by using the set {e1, ie1, ..., en, ien}, which effectively doubles the dimension from n to 2n. The dimension of X remains n when considered as a complex vector space, but becomes 2n when viewed as a real vector space. The discussion highlights the linear independence of e1 and ie1 over the reals, while they are dependent over the complex numbers. Various methods for constructing real bases from complex bases are acknowledged, emphasizing that the choice of basis can be flexible. The concept of complexification is also introduced, suggesting a way to embed a real vector space into a complex one.
azdang
Messages
80
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let {e1,...,en} be a basis for a complex vector space X. Find a basis for X regarded as a real vector space. What is the dimension of X in either case?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I'm really not sure where to begin with this question.
Are the ej's something like (i, 0, 0,...), (0,i,0,...)?
If so, could we take {ie1,...,ien} as the basis for X regarded as a real vector space?

Also, I think that the dimension in either case is n. Does anyone know if that is correct?

Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the case when n=1 and try to generalize. Notice that over C:

a*e1 = (x+iy)e1 = xe1 + yie1

And this is zero if and only if x and y are, so we immediately get that e1 and ie1 are linearly independent.
 
Thank you for your response.

I definitely see why that is true, but I am confused as to what role that fact plays into this problem. Do you think you could explain it? Thanks so much.
 
The point is that over C, e1 and i*e1 are not linearly independent. Over R, they are.
 
A blast from the past:
Sorry, I did a search, and got this post; thought it would be better to followup on
it instead of doing a new post:


Is this considered to be the canonical way of turning an n- complex vector space into
a 2n-real vector space.?. I mean, there are many ways of getting a real basis once
we are given a complex basis, but this one seems to be nice in that the original basis
seems to be somehow "embedded" in the real basis {e1,ie1,...,en,ien}.

Also: is there a construction that allows us to go in the opposite direction, i.e.,
we are given an n-real vector space V_r , and we want to construct a complex
vector space in which V_r is " embedded" , in the sense that if we were to forget/drop
the complex part, we would get V_r back, i.e., if we took the basis {e1,ie1,..,en,ien}
as above, and we ignored the vectors iej , to get the vector space V_r with basis:
{e1,e2,...,en}. Is this the complexification of V_r.?

Thanks.
 
You are really just talking about choices of basis here. {e1,(1+i)e1...en,(1+i)en} is also a 2n vector real basis for the complex space. The 'real' part is still embedded in there. It's all pretty arbitrary, as far as I know.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K