Battleship and Configuration probabilities

cecih
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

I'm doing a study that looks at how children think probabilistically while playing battleship. I'm trying to figure out the probabilities of the different configurations of the ships that can exist. So for those that don't know battleship--there is a 10 x 10 grid and you have to hide 5 ships ( one of length 5, 1 of length 4, 2 of length 3, and 1 of length 2). The ships can traditionally only be placed horizontally or vertically. This leads to the following possible configurations: all 5 ships being placed horizontally, 4 ships being placed horizontally and 1 vertically, 3 ships being placed horizontally and 2 vertically, 2 ships being placed horizontally and 3 vertically, 1 ship being placed horizontally and 4 vertically, and all ships being placed vertically. Its been a while since I've done this type of math--so I'm at a bit of a loss as to where to start--and the variation in ship size as well as space constraints are throwing me off as well--any suggestions on how to approach this problem?

Many thanks in advance,

Cecilia
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a tricky one - 120 ways to place the 1x5 ship (60 horiz, 60 vert), 140 ways to place the 1x4 etc ... multiplied together and subtracting the few that intersect, this would be about 10^10 combinations altogether. I'm not sure if there's a way to simplify this to a manageable number of separate cases, so maybe a random simulation would be the way to go?
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

2
Replies
74
Views
5K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
405
Back
Top