Hi!(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I just want to check that I'm getting this right.

Suppose we have a DAG for a Bayesian network:

V S

\ /

\ /

C

Each variable is discrete and has two possible values, named v1 and v2 and similar for the others.

We know the priors P(v) and P(s) and also the conditional on C, P(c1,v1,s1), P(c1,v1,s2)...

Then [itex]P(v1|c1)=\frac{P(c1,v1,s1)+P(c1,v1,s2)}{P(c1,v1,s1)+P(c1,v1,s2)+P(c1,v2,s1)+P(c1,v2,s2)}[/itex]

And [itex]P(v1|c1,s1)= P(c1,vs,s1)[/itex]

Is that right?

Also, is the fact that P(v1|c1,s1) and P(v1|c1,s2) are different mean that the conditional probabilities of V are not independent of its non-descendants?

And therefore that is what makes this DAG not satisfy the Markov Assumption?

Thank you for your time.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Bayesian/causal networks: just a fast check

Loading...

Similar Threads - Bayesian causal networks | Date |
---|---|

Does this ANN make Benjamins? | Sep 27, 2017 |

Network Cabling Testing (for home) | Jun 28, 2017 |

Basic Question about Users in a System (like the PF for example) | May 1, 2017 |

Networking VMs? | Feb 16, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**