Bead moving down a Helical Wire subject to Constraints

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the constraints of a bead moving down a helical wire, specifically the relationship between the angle of rotation (φ) and the vertical position (z) in terms of the pitch (h) of the helix. Participants clarify that h represents the height of one complete turn of the helix, correcting misunderstandings about its definition. The formula φ - (2π/h)z = 0 is examined, with questions raised about the implications of the 2π factor. Ultimately, the confusion is resolved as participants acknowledge the correct definition of pitch and its application in the context of the helical motion. The conversation concludes with a consensus on the definitions and relationships involved.
deuteron
Messages
64
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
What is the constraint for the bead on a helix wire moving under gravitation ignoring friction?
Relevant Equations
##q=\{r,\phi,z\}\ \hat=## cylindrical coordinates
One of the constraints is given as ##r=R##, which is very obvious. The second constraint is however given as

$$\phi - \frac {2\pi} h z=0$$

where ##h## is the increase of ##z## in one turn of the helix. Physically, I can't see where this constraint comes from and how ##\phi=\frac {2\pi}h z##.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think ##h## is the total height of the helix, since it has a constant slope, ##\phi## is the angle turned as a function of the vertical position ##z##

Is there a digram of the helix that would contradict that?
 
Last edited:
I think h is the pitch.
 
Gordianus said:
I think h is the pitch.
I agree.

@deuteron
Please, see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cylindrical_coordinate_system

Cylindrical.png
 
Last edited:
Lnewqban said:
I agree.
Can you explain the ##2 \pi## in the numerator? The pitch is the vertical rise per unit angle turned. So lets say the pitch is ## h = \frac{1 \text{[m]}}{ 2 \pi \text{[rad]}}##, if we let ##z## be ##1 \text{[m]} ##, then the angle turned ##\phi## would be ## 4 \pi^2 \text{[rad]} ## according to the formula...that seems to be a contradiction?
 
Last edited:
erobz said:
I think ##h## is the total height of the helix, since it has a constant slope, ##\phi## is the angle turned as a function of the vertical position ##z##

Is there a digram of the helix that would contradict that?
There isn't a diagram but I edited the question to clarify what ##h## is, it is given as the increase of ##z## in one turn
 
deuteron said:
There isn't a diagram but I edited the question to clarify what ##h## is, it is given as the increase of ##z## in one turn
So if ##h## is indeed the pitch, am I having a brain fart in post #5?
 
erobz said:
Can you explain the ##2 \pi## in the numerator? The pitch is the vertical rise per unit angle turned. So lets say the pitch is ## h = \frac{1 \text{[m]}}{ 2 \pi \text{[rad]}}##, if we let ##z## be ##1 \text{[m]} ##, then the angle turned ##\phi## would be ## 4 \pi^2 \text{[rad]} ## according to the formula...that seems to be a contradiction?
Wrong definition of pitch. From Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helix):
"The pitch of a helix is the height of one complete helix turn, measured parallel to the axis of the helix." (Emphasis added.)
 
renormalize said:
Wrong definition of pitch. From Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helix):
"The pitch of a helix is the height of one complete helix turn, measured parallel to the axis of the helix." (Emphasis added.)
I guess I should have checked the definition. Thanks. @deuteron sorry for any confusion.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
erobz said:
Can you explain the ##2 \pi## in the numerator?
Hi @erobz
Sorry about delayed answer.
Is this still confusing?
I agreed because I believed that the values of h and z should be equal for one full turn (2π radians) or rotation of the particle.
 
  • #11
Lnewqban said:
Hi @erobz
Sorry about delayed answer.
Is this still confusing?
I agreed because I believed that the values of h and z should be equal for one full turn (2π radians) or rotation of the particle.
@renormalize set me straight. I assumed an incorrect definition of pitch for a helix. I don't know if its still confusing for the OP @deuteron however?
 
  • #12
Sorry for the late reply, it is clear now! Thanks everyone!
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and erobz
Back
Top