Beat Physics E&M: Is Electromagnetism Harder Than Mechanics?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter meister
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E&m Mechanics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Electromagnetism (E&M) is widely regarded as more challenging than mechanics due to its complex mathematics and the abstract nature of its concepts. Factors influencing the difficulty of E&M include the instructor's teaching effectiveness, the clarity of the textbook, and the student's personal aptitude and study habits. To succeed in E&M, students should focus on evaluating their instructor and textbook, and develop their physical intuition through extensive problem-solving. Recommended resources include the book "E&M" by Duffin and a recent release by Wiley.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly mechanics
  • Familiarity with mathematical techniques used in physics, such as calculus
  • Ability to evaluate educational resources, including textbooks and instructors
  • Problem-solving skills specific to physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research effective teaching methods for physics instructors
  • Explore textbooks that complement E&M courses, such as "E&M" by Duffin
  • Practice problem-solving techniques to build physical intuition in E&M
  • Investigate historical context and conceptual development of electromagnetism
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics courses, particularly those struggling with electromagnetism, educators seeking to improve their teaching methods, and anyone interested in enhancing their understanding of E&M concepts and problem-solving strategies.

meister
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
I've just completed my first year of physics. I got A's in the first two quarters, but E&M gave me a hearty asskicking. Is electromagnetism supposed to be this difficult? Is it an aberration or the norm for physics classes from now on?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are too many variable to say with certainty. Your teacher's skill, your book's clarity, your personal aptitude, your study habits, etc. all come into play in determining how difficult or how easy a subject is to learn. Just because E&M was difficult for you does not mean that anything else will be; on the other hand, just because mechanics was easy for you also does not mean anything else will be.

E&M is, by most accounts, more difficult than mechanics, largely because it involves more difficult mathematics and does not deal with things you can see or feel with your own senses. You don't have much "E&M intuition" when you first walk into the classroom -- you just have to solve lots and lots of problems to build it up.

This is my "algorithm:"

Step 1) Rate the instructor. Is he clear? Does he explain in enough detail to make the homework only moderately difficult, or does he solve micky-mouse problems in class and expect you to solve problems a hundred times more difficult in homework? Does he seem to really care if you understand or not? If the instructor sucks, get another one and return to step one.

Step 2) Rate the book he's chosen to use. Is it clear and thorough? Does it explain in enough detail to make its problem sets only moderately difficult? Does it seem to pull things out of thin air all the time? Does it follow along closely enough with your instructor's pedagogical flow? Your book should be a sort of glorified reference, and should be able to at least reiterate what your teacher said in class when you get stumped. It should complement his lectures, not provide an entirely different way of looking at things. If the book sucks, buy an additional, better one, and return to step two.

Step 3) Build up your physical intuition. Solve many, many problems, until you can look at a problem and begin salivating (a la Palov) because you know exactly how the answer is going to look before your pencil hits the paper. If you look at a problem and don't have at least a good solid educated guess about how the problem is going to turn out, you should go back and do some simpler ones first.

- Warren
 
Originally posted by meister
I've just completed my first year of physics. I got A's in the first two quarters, but E&M gave me a hearty asskicking. Is electromagnetism supposed to be this difficult? Is it an aberration or the norm for physics classes from now on?

I am of the opinion that EM is in fact harder than mechanics, and the discrepancy in difficulty increases as you move up the ladder. It's not that the math is so advanced (conceptually), it's that the problems are so much more complicated when formulated mathematically.
 
Originally posted by meister
I've just completed my first year of physics. I got A's in the first two quarters, but E&M gave me a hearty asskicking. Is electromagnetism supposed to be this difficult? Is it an aberration or the norm for physics classes from now on?

It depends on the individual. I loved that part of it. I did excellant in it. I had a harder time with thermo.

Pete
 
I always found E&M hard: the maths is difficult in addition to it being rather under-developed conceptually, for historical reasons.

I've just finished my second year and I found E&M by Duffin to be a massive help. The publisher Wily released a book of the same name recently too, which is also pretty good.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K