##BeCl_2## and his brother ##BeH_2##

  • Thread starter Thread starter mooncrater
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
BeCl2 and BeH2 share a similar structure but differ in bonding types. Both compounds are covalently bonded, with BeCl2 existing as a polymer. The solution indicates that dotted lines represent hydrogen bonds, while solid arrows signify coordinate bonds. However, BeH2 does not form hydrogen bonds, implying its bonding is purely covalent. The presence of lone pairs in certain atoms allows for the formation of dative or coordination bonds.
mooncrater
Messages
215
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


There was a question about ##BeCl_2## and ##BeH_2## which had a statement :
" Both have similar structure but different bonding. "
Which was marked correct.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The problem I am facing is that in the solution dotted lines are given between the B-H bond and solid arrows (##\longrightarrow##) for the B-Cl bond. So do those represent a hydrogen bond and a coordinate bond respectively?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mooncrater said:

Homework Statement


There was a question about ##BeCl_2## and ##BeH_2## which had a statement :
" Both have similar structure but different bonding. "
Which was marked correct.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The problem I am facing is that in the solution dotted lines are given between the B-H bond and solid arrows (##\longrightarrow##) for the B-Cl bond. So do those represent a hydrogen bond and a coordinate bond respectively?
First hydrogen bond is for some specific atoms. What are those ?
 
F, O and N.
 
mooncrater said:
F, O and N.
So what does it imply to your attempt?
 
Raghav Gupta said:
So what does it imply to your attempt?
It doesn't form hydrogen bonds... so is it a covalent one?
 
mooncrater said:
It doesn't form hydrogen bonds... so is it a covalent one?
Both BeCl2 and BeH2 are covalently bonded.
The main difference is one exists as a polymer.
The atom having lone pair can form dative or coordination bonds.
 
  • Like
Likes mooncrater
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top