Been trying to figure this one out for some time

  • Thread starter Thread starter imperiale
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Figure Time
imperiale
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
LogeX=2loge(100-y^2)+C where X(0)=100 find C.
i keep getting different ans, don't know where i am going wrong
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We can't tell you what you are doing wrong if you don't tell us what you are doing!

Also, what do you mean by X(0)? Are you thinking of X as a function of y? That is, X(0)= 100 means that if y= 0, X= 100?
 
imperiale said:
LogeX=2loge(100-y^2)+C where X(0)=100 find C.
i keep getting different ans, don't know where i am going wrong

Assuming this equation is more correctly written as:
Log(e^X) = 2 * Log[e^(100-Y^2)] + C

and, assuming
HallsofIvy said:
... what do you mean by X(0)? Are you thinking of X as a function of y? That is, X(0)= 100 means that if y= 0, X= 100?

then we have:
Log(e^100) = 2 * Log(e^100) + C
and C = -Log(e^100)

But, if you really mean to use natural log (Ln), rather than the base 10 logarithm (Log), the equation becomes:
Ln(e^100) = 2 * Ln(e^100) + C

and, since Ln(e^x) = x, we have:
100 = 2 * 100 + C
100 = 200 + C
C = -100
 
I assumed that he does not mean log(ex) but that "Loge" meant "log base e" or natural logarithm.

Hopefully, imperiale will come back and explain in more detail exactly what he is trying to do.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I assumed that he does not mean log(ex) but that "Loge" meant "log base e" or natural logarithm.

If this is the case, then using Log base e (better known as natural logarithm, or "Ln"), the equation becomes:
Ln(X) = 2 * Ln(100 - Y^2) + C

and, still assuming
HallsofIvy said:
... what do you mean by X(0)? Are you thinking of X as a function of y? That is, X(0)= 100 means that if y= 0, X= 100?

we would have:
Ln(100) = 2 * Ln(100) + C
and C = -Ln(100)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top