epkid08
- 264
- 1
What type of living organisms were there?
epkid08 said:How did we reproduce/evolve from nothing...
NoTime said:How do they contradict each other?
NoTime said:The theories discuss two quite different things.
Note that it is possible to have a universe that will not support life or for that matter sun and planet formation.
Since this particular universe has a structure that can support life the discussion of the evolution of life is meaningful.
In some universe structured differently it would not be.
epkid08 said:If there were no living organisms before the big bang, how are there living organisms after? How did we evolve from something that wasn't there?
Okay, I'm not quite sure what your point is here. Both theories are accepted for our universe.
BoomBoom said:This topic sounds earily familiar to another thread we had a little while ago where someone was trying to connect the Big Bang to evolution of life. As we asserted over and over in that thread, the BB and evolution are separate topics that have nothing to do with each other.
epkid08 said:If there were no living organisms before the big bang, how are there living organisms after? How did we evolve from something that wasn't there?
NoTime said:I suggest you actually read the Big Bang theory.
The framing of your questions indicates that you do not have a good grasp of the theories you're asking about, however.epkid08 said:The main point of my topic is not about the theory of evolution or what it states
it's about how can living organisms exist if they had nothing to reproduce from or evolve from, given that "Nothing existed before the Big Bang."