I Behaviour of Magnetic Fields Underwater

AI Thread Summary
Magnetic fields behave differently in underwater environments due to the unique properties of seawater, which is conductive and can be considered anisotropic. The decay of magnetic field strength with distance in the ocean is influenced by factors such as conductivity, permittivity, and permeability, with general expectations of cubic decay rates. The time it takes for a sensor to detect changes in the magnetic field from a point source underwater varies, leading to conflicting information in existing literature. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately detecting magnetic anomalies up to 100 meters underwater. Clarifying these concepts is essential for anyone studying electromagnetic theory in marine contexts.
sjr
TL;DR Summary
Expected decay rate and speed of magnetic field changes underwater.
I've been trying to pick up the fundamentals of electromagnetic theory and I reckon I'm doing alright, but I've run into a some questions about how magnetic fields behave in an anisotropic fluid medium like the ocean. There is an awful lot of conflicting information online. Ultimately, I'd like to be able to detect magnetic field anomalies at a range of up to 100m under the water as accurately as possible.

A couple of questions:

1. The rate at which the strength of a magnetic field decays with distance remains somewhat unclear to me. I understand there are near field and far field implications, and in general the field strength will decay at a cubic rate. Can someone offer me a clear explanation of the expected rate of magnetic field decay with distance in a medium like the ocean, and how it's affected by conductivity, permittivity and permeability, and so on? This part I haven't figured out yet.

2. The 'propagation' of magnetic field changes in the ocean. Consider a basic problem. A point source ##O## lies in the ocean and directly ahead of it there is a sensor ##A## a range ##r##. We then activate a magnetic field at ##O##. Assuming it is capable of doing so, how long will it take the sensor ##A## to detect a resultant change or 'front' in its vicinity? I'm consistently reading very different answers to this question.

If you could offer me any guidance on this I'd really appreciate it :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

sjr said:
I've been trying to pick up the fundamentals of electromagnetic theory and I reckon I'm doing alright, but I've run into a some questions about how magnetic fields behave in an anisotropic fluid medium like the ocean.
Why do you say that you think that conductive seawater is anisotropic with respect to magnetic fields? And are you expecting a strong interaction, or a weak interaction? :wink:

https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/12450
 
I should have worded that line differently, I wasn't specifically referring to magnetism.

I'm interested in how physical characteristics of seawater may cause magnetic fields to behave slightly differently in the ocean than they would in free space. I'm not making any assumptions at all right now, I'm just trying to make sense of the all the conflicting stuff I'm reading.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top