Bending Moment How are they getting this value?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the critical bending moment (Mcritical) in a structural mechanics context, specifically related to a beam subjected to loads. Participants are examining the values of reactions (R1 and R2) and the resulting bending moments, with a focus on understanding discrepancies in calculated values.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the calculation of Mcritical, questioning how a value of 30,000 lb-in is derived when their own calculations yield 135 kip-in.
  • Another participant suggests that the initial calculations may have errors, particularly in the assignment of values to R1 and R2, indicating that R1 should be smaller due to its position relative to the load.
  • A participant proposes that the maximum bending moment occurs directly under the load and encourages recalculating the moments from both reactions to verify consistency.
  • There is a discussion about the importance of the point under the load for determining maximum bending moment, especially in cases of variable cross sections.
  • Participants engage in a side conversation about forum etiquette and the use of quoting in replies, which reflects on the dynamics of communication within the thread.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct value of Mcritical or the calculations leading to it. Disagreement exists regarding the assignment of values to R1 and R2 and the implications for the bending moment calculations.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of potential errors in the initial calculations and assumptions about the reactions, but these remain unresolved within the discussion. The conversation also touches on the importance of clarity in communication and adherence to forum guidelines.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



Picture3-15.png

Picture2-20.png


I have no idea how they are getting this value for Mcritical

Picture1-34.png



R1 and R2 are 7.5 kip and 2.5 kip, respectively. My bending diagram shows that the max moment should be (12+6)"(7.5 kip)= 135 kip-in

What on Earth are they doing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wtf :confused:
 
Sorry Saladsamurai, you'd have to wait for people to read you post and begin to respond before you get frustrated. If you read the guidelines:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=94388
you will find that a wait time of 24-48 hours should be normal.

> R1 and R2 are 7.5 kip and 2.5 kip, respectively.
I believe you erred in this calculation. R1 being further away from the 10-kip load than R2, so R1 should be smaller, right?

> My bending diagram shows that the max moment should be (12+6)"(7.5 kip)= 135 kip-in
Had you not inverted the reactions, you would have got the correct maximum bending moment, which happens to be right under the 10-kip load.
You could do the calculations for R1 and R2, and calculate the bending moment under the load from R1 and from R2. They should be identical.
 
mathmate said:
Sorry Saladsamurai, you'd have to wait for people to read you post and begin to respond before you get frustrated. If you read the guidelines:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=94388
you will find that a wait time of 24-48 hours should be normal.

And it says all that in the guidelines :rolleyes: Believe it or not, I have posted here on Pf before.

Sometimes I just post random things when I am venting. :smile:Now, back to business. So I reversed the reactions when I typed this. Either way, I did get 135 kip-in which is exactly my point.

I wanted to know how they got 30 000 lb-in.
 
Last edited:
> I have posted here on Pf before.
I understand that. I was a little worried that after 1691 posts and crowned with the title "pf contributor", you don't seem to understand the rules. It doesn't give good examples to little brothers, you know? ;)

> Sometimes I just post random things when I am venting.
That sounds reasonable. I also understand that you are probably in a rush to show something to your professor.

> Either way, I did get 135 kip-in which is exactly my point.
Can you show your workings how you get 135 kip-in. working from R1 (2.5 Kips) and R2(7.5 kips)? ;)

Since you are in a rush, I am going to give you another hint:
For a uniform cross section, the most important point to consider along the span is the point under the load, namely where there is maximum bending moment.
For a variable cross section with a weaker and a stronger section, it is possible that the maximum stress be found elsewhere, right?
 
Mathmate: If you want to be a moderator, talk to Greg. I am not here to set the Pf archetype.

I am not in a rush to show a professor anything. I am just plain in a rush.

If you learn to use the quote button, I would not have thought that you were merely confirming my 135 lbf-in moment, I would have realized that you were quoting me.

If you think I'm an a$$hole, it's because I am.

:smile:
 
If you want to be a moderator...
Not at all, I'd rather spend time on mathmatical problems than behavorial ones. Thanks for the suggestion anyway.

If you learn to use the quote button...
I got carried away when I had a limited time to finish my post. Thank you for correctly reminding me about the quote format here. I usually use the square brackets format instead of the quote button, which I didn't even realize existed until you mentioned it. I am more faithful to the keyboard than the mouse.

I am not here to argue with anyone or to judge anyone. I am here to plain give help to others who could use some, hopefully in an environment where people conduct themselves with reasonable manner and language.

Back to business here. Have you found the answer to the question? This is the essential part of our conversation.
 
Yes, I have. Thank you. And I am sure that we will be great friends in the end :smile:
 
That was enlightening!
 
  • #10
We sure will be!
 
  • #11
Dr.D said:
That was enlightening!

Glad we could oblige! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K