Bending of a parabolic plate with some thickness

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the deflection of a parabolic plate with thickness, clamped at one end and subjected to a concentrated load at the apex. Participants explore theoretical approaches, mathematical formulations, and potential modeling techniques related to this problem.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a formula for deflection of a parabolic plate under a concentrated load.
  • Another participant suggests using a Finite Element model and simplifying the problem by treating it as a straight beam or channel-section beam, depending on the plate's shape.
  • A third participant proposes using the Euler-Bernoulli beam equation for deflection, but expresses uncertainty about the geometry of the problem.
  • A later reply clarifies that the plate is not a parabolic cross-section but a parabolic-shaped plate, indicating that the moment of inertia is a function of position along the width.
  • One participant suggests that calculating the deflection should be straightforward by integrating the moment of inertia into the deflection equation, while also outlining specific boundary conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate modeling techniques and equations to use, indicating that multiple competing approaches exist. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best method to calculate deflection.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity introduced by the non-axisymmetric clamp and the varying moment of inertia along the width of the plate, which may affect the calculations. There is also uncertainty regarding the geometry and assumptions made in the problem.

oldk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am trying to obtain a relation for calculating the deflection of a parabolic plate of thickness (say 't') clamped at one end, with a concentrated load along the center line at the "apex" end.

Any direct links for the formula?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds complicated, especially because of the non-axisymmetric clamp on just one side. I'd use a Finite Element model together with some limiting simplified cases, such as treating it as a straight beam with the same thickness, and as a channel-section beam with the same overall thickness. That's if it's reasonably flat shaped. Would be different if it's a deep bowl.

That's if it's a revolved parabola. If it's just a 2D shape with arbitrary "thickness" then you can do hand calculations all the way.
 


If I'm getting it right you have a parabolic cross-section. In that case, I believe that you can use the deflection equation from beam theory:

[tex]\frac{dw^2}{dx^2}=\frac{M}{EI}[/tex]

Here's the link from wiki:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler–Bernoulli_beam_equation

I'm not sure if I understand the geometry of your problem correctly, so I can't really tell you more :) Be careful with the moment of inertia though, it should be calculated in respect to the center of mass of your cross-section.
 


Hi,

Thanks for the reply.

I am attaching the geometry of the plate. It is not a parabolic cross section but a parabolic shaped plate. The moment of inertia would be a function of x (width of the plate is a function of x -- see attached) and I would like to obtain a deflection function as a function of x (i.e, if I know the position along the center line where I apply the force, I should know the deflection from that positional force).

I hope the attached helps.

Thanks again!
 

Attachments



Then this should be pretty straightforward to calculate, you just replace the equation for the moment of inertia into the equation of the deflection and you'll get the equation you need by integrating twice.

Your boundary conditions would be:

[tex]w(x=0)=0 , \frac{\partial w(x=0)}{\partial x}=0 , \frac{\partial^2 w(x=0)}{\partial x^2}=0[/tex]
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K