Is Variation During Reproduction Beneficial for the Individual?

AI Thread Summary
Variation during reproduction is advantageous for species as it enhances survival in changing environments, exemplified by bacteria that can withstand temperature increases due to global warming. However, this variation does not guarantee benefits for every individual within a population, as some may lack advantageous traits and fail to survive or reproduce. The concept highlights that while genetic diversity can lead to overall population resilience, it can also result in winners and losers among individuals. Consequently, individuals with less favorable traits may not contribute to the next generation, illustrating the disparity in reproductive success. Ultimately, while variation supports species survival, it does not ensure individual benefits.
navneet9431

Homework Statement


Variation during reproduction is beneficial to the species but not necessarily for the individual?

Homework Equations


Not any

The Attempt at a Solution


I only know about variation during reproduction is beneficial to the species but I don't know anything about how it is not necessarily beneficial for individual.
I think it is beneficial for species because it helps the species of various organisms to survive and flourish even in adverse environment. For example if there is a population of certain bacteria living in temperate water (which is neither very hot no very cold) and the temperature of water increases too much due to global warming then most of these bacteria will not be able to tolerate excessive heat and hence die but some bacteria which had variations to resist heat would survive and grow further.

But,I do not know how it is not necessarily beneficial for individual?

Note:I am a high school student and English is my second language. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of the poor bacteria in your story that had a variation to resist cold bett er than average. They died first !
 
Asked about the statement:
navneet9431 said:
Variation during reproduction is beneficial to the species but not necessarily for the individual?

This is a statement about genetic inheritance of factors affecting reproductive success in a breeding (evolutionarially successful) population. These would be the genetic factors, in a breeding population, selected for (at some time when genetic variation is needed), due to their position in some gradient of the genetic variation.

What you just described:
navneet9431 said:
I think it is beneficial for species because it helps the species of various organisms to survive and flourish even in adverse environment. For example if there is a population of certain bacteria living in temperate water (which is neither very hot no very cold) and the temperature of water increases too much due to global warming then most of these bacteria will not be able to tolerate excessive heat and hence die but some bacteria which had variations to resist heat would survive and grow further.

is a good example of the beneficial side of the statement:
navneet9431 said:
Variation during reproduction is beneficial to the species

The
navneet9431 said:
not necessarily for the individual
part is just saying that, at some some times when variation in reproductive success, at a population level can be good for survival (and being positively selected for) will not work out for all sections of a reproductive population.

At some point, there will be winners and losers, perhaps resulting from a change in environment, as you suggested.
Some of those organisms, will not reproduce or may out right die (equivalent from an evolutionary point of view, not adding genetically, to the next generation).
From the point of view of an individual (in the genetically based losing part of the population), the effects of the changes (which population level genetic variation can overcome) will not be beneficial to all individuals with in the population. Some will be in the reproductively losing part of the population. They are the "not necessarily (beneficial) for the individual" part.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top